Margin of error: accuracy of estimated excision margins by surgical experience

Harriet K Semple, Marc J Langbart
{"title":"Margin of error: accuracy of estimated excision margins by surgical experience","authors":"Harriet K Semple, Marc J Langbart","doi":"10.34239/ajops.v5n1.257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Guidelines for recommended margins for common lesions are well documented. While it is recommended that all margins be measured prior to excision, time pressures, lack of equipment or clinician confidence may result in margins that are estimated rather than formally measured. This increases the risk of involved margins and need for re-excision to prevent recurrence. We reviewed the estimated margins of common excisions and compared these between groups of different surgical experience. We found that while accuracy generally improves with surgical experience, margins are largely underestimated by all groups. We hope to encourage the use of formally measured margins in all lesion excisions.\n \n ","PeriodicalId":264055,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Plastic Surgery","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34239/ajops.v5n1.257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Guidelines for recommended margins for common lesions are well documented. While it is recommended that all margins be measured prior to excision, time pressures, lack of equipment or clinician confidence may result in margins that are estimated rather than formally measured. This increases the risk of involved margins and need for re-excision to prevent recurrence. We reviewed the estimated margins of common excisions and compared these between groups of different surgical experience. We found that while accuracy generally improves with surgical experience, margins are largely underestimated by all groups. We hope to encourage the use of formally measured margins in all lesion excisions.    
误差范围:根据手术经验估计切除边缘的准确性
对于常见病变的推荐切缘的指导原则有很好的文献记载。虽然建议在切除前测量所有切缘,但时间压力、设备缺乏或临床医生的信心可能导致切缘是估计的,而不是正式测量的。这增加了受累边缘的风险,需要再次切除以防止复发。我们回顾了常见切除的估计边缘,并在不同手术经验的组之间进行了比较。我们发现,虽然准确度通常随着手术经验的增加而提高,但所有组的切缘在很大程度上都被低估了。我们希望鼓励在所有病变切除中使用正式测量的边缘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信