Legitimation of Religious Symbols in Politics: Descriptive Analysis of The Narration of Indonesian Election Campaign 2019

Sonny Eli Zaluchu, Stephanus Karnadhi, F. Widjaja, H. Siahaan
{"title":"Legitimation of Religious Symbols in Politics: Descriptive Analysis of The Narration of Indonesian Election Campaign 2019","authors":"Sonny Eli Zaluchu, Stephanus Karnadhi, F. Widjaja, H. Siahaan","doi":"10.2991/icdesa-19.2019.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The presence of religious symbols in the narrative and campaign for the 2019 general election in Indonesia concludes that religion can be a political tool for directing political choices. Religion and symbols are used as vehicles and a way to mobilize the masses to get the votes of voters. As a result, Indonesians are permissive to the phenomenon and are involved in the polarization of identity politics. Democracy, which should be the stage for fighting for ideas, turns into religious legitimacy against political interests. From the private sphere, religion turns into a political strategy in the public sphere. This article discusses and conducts a descriptive analysis of the use of religious narratives and symbols by Indonesian political actors seen from four approaches, namely religiosity, ritual expression, Religion and Public Role and Politics of Identity and Pop Culture. The findings through descriptive literature analysis show that the use of religious symbols is not related to the religious attitude of the Indonesian people and is not part of religious rituals. This attitude arises as an effort to build and carry out identity politics, to gain political interests and not for the interests of religion and religious people.","PeriodicalId":358868,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference of Democratisation in Southeast Asia (ICDeSA 2019)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference of Democratisation in Southeast Asia (ICDeSA 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/icdesa-19.2019.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The presence of religious symbols in the narrative and campaign for the 2019 general election in Indonesia concludes that religion can be a political tool for directing political choices. Religion and symbols are used as vehicles and a way to mobilize the masses to get the votes of voters. As a result, Indonesians are permissive to the phenomenon and are involved in the polarization of identity politics. Democracy, which should be the stage for fighting for ideas, turns into religious legitimacy against political interests. From the private sphere, religion turns into a political strategy in the public sphere. This article discusses and conducts a descriptive analysis of the use of religious narratives and symbols by Indonesian political actors seen from four approaches, namely religiosity, ritual expression, Religion and Public Role and Politics of Identity and Pop Culture. The findings through descriptive literature analysis show that the use of religious symbols is not related to the religious attitude of the Indonesian people and is not part of religious rituals. This attitude arises as an effort to build and carry out identity politics, to gain political interests and not for the interests of religion and religious people.
宗教符号在政治中的正当性:对2019年印尼大选叙事的描述性分析
宗教符号在2019年印尼大选叙事和竞选活动中的存在表明,宗教可以成为指导政治选择的政治工具。宗教和象征被用作动员群众的工具和手段,以获得选民的选票。因此,印尼人对这种现象持宽容态度,并卷入了身份政治的两极分化。民主本应是思想斗争的舞台,却变成了反对政治利益的宗教合法性。宗教从私人领域转变为公共领域的政治策略。本文从宗教性、仪式表达、宗教与公共角色、身份与流行文化的政治四个方面对印尼政治行动者对宗教叙事和符号的使用进行了讨论和描述性分析。通过描述性文献分析的结果表明,宗教符号的使用与印度尼西亚人民的宗教态度无关,也不是宗教仪式的一部分。这种态度的产生是为了建立和实施身份政治,是为了获得政治利益,而不是为了宗教和宗教人士的利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信