Understanding Aceh Referendum Discourse in the Context of Asymmetric Decentralisation

Sait Abdullah, Deni Ramdani
{"title":"Understanding Aceh Referendum Discourse in the Context of Asymmetric Decentralisation","authors":"Sait Abdullah, Deni Ramdani","doi":"10.2991/icdesa-19.2019.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a result of recent political dynamic, particularly after the world most complicated simultaneous national elections, Aceh referendum discourse has been reechoed by Acehnese local elite. This issue has become an interesting phenomenon to be investigated. As a result of MOU Helsinki Peace Agreement in 2005, Aceh has been granted as a special region by the central government by way of an asymmetric decentralisation scheme to run its government. Is it true that the local Acehnese really want the referendum? Or is it just a political discourse enacted by the local elites for their own political interests? This paper examines how ideology operates through discourse. It uses Van Dijk ideological discourse analysis. This paper argues that referendum issue reenacted is not just an ordinary elite’ speech. It strongly entails political ideology of certain group. For ideology to operate in discourse, local elites have strategically manipulated context, event, knowledge and their group belief both to attract public attention and to strengthen their political bargaining position with the national elites. Keywords— Referendum, Asymmetric Decentralisation,","PeriodicalId":358868,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference of Democratisation in Southeast Asia (ICDeSA 2019)","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference of Democratisation in Southeast Asia (ICDeSA 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/icdesa-19.2019.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a result of recent political dynamic, particularly after the world most complicated simultaneous national elections, Aceh referendum discourse has been reechoed by Acehnese local elite. This issue has become an interesting phenomenon to be investigated. As a result of MOU Helsinki Peace Agreement in 2005, Aceh has been granted as a special region by the central government by way of an asymmetric decentralisation scheme to run its government. Is it true that the local Acehnese really want the referendum? Or is it just a political discourse enacted by the local elites for their own political interests? This paper examines how ideology operates through discourse. It uses Van Dijk ideological discourse analysis. This paper argues that referendum issue reenacted is not just an ordinary elite’ speech. It strongly entails political ideology of certain group. For ideology to operate in discourse, local elites have strategically manipulated context, event, knowledge and their group belief both to attract public attention and to strengthen their political bargaining position with the national elites. Keywords— Referendum, Asymmetric Decentralisation,
非对称分权背景下的亚齐公投话语理解
由于最近的政治动态,特别是在世界上最复杂的全国同步选举之后,亚齐公投的话语得到了亚齐当地精英的回应。这个问题已经成为一个值得研究的有趣现象。根据2005年签署的《赫尔辛基和平协定》谅解备忘录,亚齐被中央政府批准为一个特殊地区,通过不对称的权力下放计划来管理其政府。当地的亚齐人真的想要公投吗?或者这只是当地精英为了自己的政治利益而制定的政治话语?本文探讨了意识形态如何通过话语发挥作用。本文采用了范戴克的意识形态话语分析。本文认为,全民公决问题的重演并不仅仅是一个普通精英的言论。它强烈地包含了某些群体的政治意识形态。为了让意识形态在话语中发挥作用,地方精英们策略性地操纵语境、事件、知识和他们的群体信仰,以吸引公众的注意力,并加强他们与国家精英的政治谈判地位。关键词:公民投票,非对称分权,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信