Implications of Regional Regulations Cancellation Based on Law Number 23 of 2014 about Local Government and Law Number 5 Of 2004 about The Supreme Court

Hohen Saragih
{"title":"Implications of Regional Regulations Cancellation Based on Law Number 23 of 2014 about Local Government and Law Number 5 Of 2004 about The Supreme Court","authors":"Hohen Saragih","doi":"10.59683/ijls.v2i2.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cancellation of Regional Regulations is the authority of the government represented by the Supreme Court in carrying out the supervisory function both preventively and repressively. The annulment function is carried out to provide legal certainty so that the law can have a strong meaning and identity. The purpose of this research is to produce a strong understanding of the mechanism for cancelling regional regulations by the Supreme Court on the basis of filing a judicial review of the materials of regional rules that have been running and their implications for legal certainty. The method used in this study is a normative juridical method through a review of the literature, which is considered relevant to this research. Based on the results of this study, it was concluded that the mechanism for implementing the Supreme Court's decision regarding the cancellation of the Regional Regulation as stated in Article 8 paragraph (2) of Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2011, followed up by implementing the decision no later than ninety days after the decision was sent to the Regional Government. The implication is that the cancellation of a regulation by the Supreme Court directly or indirectly has binding legal force.\n ","PeriodicalId":337812,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law and Society (IJLS)","volume":"22 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law and Society (IJLS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59683/ijls.v2i2.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cancellation of Regional Regulations is the authority of the government represented by the Supreme Court in carrying out the supervisory function both preventively and repressively. The annulment function is carried out to provide legal certainty so that the law can have a strong meaning and identity. The purpose of this research is to produce a strong understanding of the mechanism for cancelling regional regulations by the Supreme Court on the basis of filing a judicial review of the materials of regional rules that have been running and their implications for legal certainty. The method used in this study is a normative juridical method through a review of the literature, which is considered relevant to this research. Based on the results of this study, it was concluded that the mechanism for implementing the Supreme Court's decision regarding the cancellation of the Regional Regulation as stated in Article 8 paragraph (2) of Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2011, followed up by implementing the decision no later than ninety days after the decision was sent to the Regional Government. The implication is that the cancellation of a regulation by the Supreme Court directly or indirectly has binding legal force.  
基于2014年地方政府第23号法和2004年大法院第5号法撤销地方法规的启示
地方法规撤销权是以最高法院为代表的政府行使预防和抑制双重监督职能的权力。废除功能的实施是为了提供法律确定性,使法律具有强烈的意义和同一性。本研究的目的是在对现行区域规则的材料及其对法律确定性的影响进行司法审查的基础上,对最高法院取消区域法规的机制产生深刻的理解。通过对文献的回顾,本研究中使用的方法是一种规范的法律方法,这被认为与本研究相关。根据本研究的结果,得出的结论是,根据2011年第1号最高法院条例第8条第(2)款,执行最高法院关于取消区域条例的决定的机制,随后在决定发送给地区政府后不迟于90天执行该决定。其含义是,最高法院直接或间接地撤销一项规定具有法律约束力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信