Creativity Techniques for Requirements Elicitation: Comparing Four-Step EPMcreate-Based Processes

A. Herrmann, Luisa Mich, D. Berry
{"title":"Creativity Techniques for Requirements Elicitation: Comparing Four-Step EPMcreate-Based Processes","authors":"A. Herrmann, Luisa Mich, D. Berry","doi":"10.1109/EmpiRE.2018.00008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[Context and motivation] The Elementary Pragmatic Model Creativity Technique, a.k.a EPMcreate, is a method for creative requirements discovery. It includes 16 steps corresponding to all the possible combinations of two classes of stakeholders' viewpoints. The feasibility and effectiveness of the full 16-step process have been confirmed by a number of experiments. The need to reduce the number of steps was observed in the very first experiments run in 2003. To address that problem, a few years later, a four-step creativity technique, POEPMcreate (Power-Only EPMcreate), was defined and tested. [Question/problem] More recently, the general problem of downsizing EPMcreate to define lighter weight processes based on sub-sets of the 16 steps has been theoretically investigated. The theoretical analysis demanded experimental confirmation. [Principal idea/Goal] This paper describes an experiment applying and comparing two four-step techniques, POEPMcreate and a new technique, ROS-EPMcreate (Redundant, Odd Step EPMcreate), resembling traditional requirements elicitation with brainstorming. [Contribution] The results of the experiment, even if preliminary, seem to indicate that ROSEPMcreate is at least as feasible and effective as POEPMcreate. The results also give new insights and suggest issues to be considered in future experiments. The paper also offers Kano categories as a new way to evaluate the innovativeness of generated requirement ideas.","PeriodicalId":247431,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 7th International Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering (EmpiRE)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 7th International Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering (EmpiRE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EmpiRE.2018.00008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

[Context and motivation] The Elementary Pragmatic Model Creativity Technique, a.k.a EPMcreate, is a method for creative requirements discovery. It includes 16 steps corresponding to all the possible combinations of two classes of stakeholders' viewpoints. The feasibility and effectiveness of the full 16-step process have been confirmed by a number of experiments. The need to reduce the number of steps was observed in the very first experiments run in 2003. To address that problem, a few years later, a four-step creativity technique, POEPMcreate (Power-Only EPMcreate), was defined and tested. [Question/problem] More recently, the general problem of downsizing EPMcreate to define lighter weight processes based on sub-sets of the 16 steps has been theoretically investigated. The theoretical analysis demanded experimental confirmation. [Principal idea/Goal] This paper describes an experiment applying and comparing two four-step techniques, POEPMcreate and a new technique, ROS-EPMcreate (Redundant, Odd Step EPMcreate), resembling traditional requirements elicitation with brainstorming. [Contribution] The results of the experiment, even if preliminary, seem to indicate that ROSEPMcreate is at least as feasible and effective as POEPMcreate. The results also give new insights and suggest issues to be considered in future experiments. The paper also offers Kano categories as a new way to evaluate the innovativeness of generated requirement ideas.
需求引出的创造性技术:比较基于epmcreate的四步流程
【语境与动机】初级语用模型创造技术,简称EPMcreate,是一种发现创造性需求的方法。它包括16个步骤,对应于两类利益相关者观点的所有可能组合。完整的16步工艺的可行性和有效性已被一些实验证实。在2003年进行的第一次实验中观察到需要减少步骤的数量。为了解决这个问题,几年后,一种四步创造力技术POEPMcreate (Power-Only EPMcreate)被定义和测试。[问题/问题]最近,缩小EPMcreate以定义基于16个步骤子集的轻量级过程的一般问题已经从理论上进行了研究。理论分析需要实验证实。[主要思想/目标]本文描述了一个实验,应用并比较了两种四步技术,POEPMcreate和一种新技术,ROS-EPMcreate(冗余,奇数步EPMcreate),类似于传统的需求激发与头脑风暴。[贡献]实验的结果,即使是初步的,似乎表明ROSEPMcreate至少与POEPMcreate一样可行和有效。研究结果还提供了新的见解,并提出了在未来实验中需要考虑的问题。本文还提出了卡诺分类作为评价生成需求思想的创新性的一种新方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信