COMMUNITY-BASED COOPERATION AS AN EFFECTIVE MECHANISM OF THE RECOVERY OF THE HIGLANDS IN GEORGIA

P. Koguashvili, N. Chikhladze
{"title":"COMMUNITY-BASED COOPERATION AS AN EFFECTIVE MECHANISM OF THE RECOVERY OF THE HIGLANDS IN GEORGIA","authors":"P. Koguashvili, N. Chikhladze","doi":"10.52244/ep.2021.22.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There could be no progress Georgia without strengthening the vitality of rural areas and agriculture. Strength of rural community depends on developing and pursuing sound public policies.\nIn the thirty-year history of Georgia's independence, there have been made numerous attempts to pursue regional policies aimed at improving the well-being of rural people. Time has shown that each strategy or program designed for this purpose has always been unsystematic and fragmented. As a result, we obtained an almost irreversible process of rural exodus in Georgia, especially in the highland border sector. \nThese areas of Georgia require highly specific approaches. Local Georgians closest to the origins of Georgian civilization still keep in their daily lives the customs that have existed continuously for many centuries (community-based use and enjoyment of land, partnership, community). The goal of the public support programs designed for them is to create conditions that will naturally encourage people to be there on a permanent-type basis. \nWe consider it expedient to create special economic entities in the higher altitude regions of the country, to which the revenues generated from pasture lands and forest funds will accumulate. Within the mentioned economic entities, agricultural production should be developed on a cooperative basis, by organizing a single production cycle within cooperatives (production, processing and marketing of primary products).\nThe owners of these types of economic entities can only be people permanently residing in a certain territory. The revenues from leasing or other agricultural activities can only be spent based on democratic decisions for general purposes to improve the living conditions. Such purposes may include education, healthcare, infrastructure, transport, etc., which will be pre-determined by the Government of Georgia.\nWhen specifying the optimal form of local territorial extent of agricultural cooperatives, priority is given to community-based cooperatives. They will be formed within the administrative units, taking into account the factors of production specialization and concentration of the productive forces. Community-based cooperatives contribute to creating conditions for mass community engagement in the cooperative process, where economies of scale can be used and population’s ability and material resources can be capitalized on the ground, which is of particular importance for inclusive (comprehensive) entrepreneurship development. \n There are unique opportunities for organic production in the mountains of Georgia. The basis for the rational use of natural pasture lands in all vertical zones is the introduction of a system of plot-rotational or similar cattle grazing. Increasing the production of all types of food (green, juicy, coarse) on natural pasture lands, improving their quality and reducing the cost is the main basis for livestock development, because 65-75% of the cost of livestock products is related to feed costs.\nThe organization of a single production cycle within the cooperative (stock feed for livestock, dairy and dairy products (including products produced on the place of origin: “dambalkhacho (a kind of blue cheese), stuffed cheese, sheep cheese), meat and meat products, wool and leather production) will ensure the rational use of grasslands, reduce feed costs and will significantly increase shareholder returns.\n In view of the diversity of non-timber forest products in the highlands of Georgia and the rapidly growing demands in international markets, wild-growing fruit picking (dog-rose, crab apple, cornel, sea buckthorn, etc.) within community cooperatives and developing their drying, storage and bio-production and sales at high prices have great potential. Creating a value chain for the production of non-timber forest products in Georgia would be ensured through supporting the strengthening of the organizational and technical-technological capabilities of the community-based cooperatives. \nThe above model of the Highland Caucasus can be extended to all communities and villages after defining the status of village and rural entrepreneur (village as a territorial unit/vital area), which implies the transfer of the permanent ownership and use of state-owned land, forest, pasture, water and mineral resources to the communities. \nIf this model is properly organized, the most complex military-political, economic and demographic problems related to the highland border sectors will be addressed without an additional financial cost to the State and changes in the internal territorial arrangement of the country. The people who live here will simultaneously act as guardians, border guards and farmers of the country.\nOne of the primary objectives of State policy should be to encourage care and support of people living in rural areas, as well as to give them incentives to work (strengthening the authority of farming) in order to feed society.","PeriodicalId":344544,"journal":{"name":"Economic Profile","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Profile","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52244/ep.2021.22.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There could be no progress Georgia without strengthening the vitality of rural areas and agriculture. Strength of rural community depends on developing and pursuing sound public policies. In the thirty-year history of Georgia's independence, there have been made numerous attempts to pursue regional policies aimed at improving the well-being of rural people. Time has shown that each strategy or program designed for this purpose has always been unsystematic and fragmented. As a result, we obtained an almost irreversible process of rural exodus in Georgia, especially in the highland border sector. These areas of Georgia require highly specific approaches. Local Georgians closest to the origins of Georgian civilization still keep in their daily lives the customs that have existed continuously for many centuries (community-based use and enjoyment of land, partnership, community). The goal of the public support programs designed for them is to create conditions that will naturally encourage people to be there on a permanent-type basis. We consider it expedient to create special economic entities in the higher altitude regions of the country, to which the revenues generated from pasture lands and forest funds will accumulate. Within the mentioned economic entities, agricultural production should be developed on a cooperative basis, by organizing a single production cycle within cooperatives (production, processing and marketing of primary products). The owners of these types of economic entities can only be people permanently residing in a certain territory. The revenues from leasing or other agricultural activities can only be spent based on democratic decisions for general purposes to improve the living conditions. Such purposes may include education, healthcare, infrastructure, transport, etc., which will be pre-determined by the Government of Georgia. When specifying the optimal form of local territorial extent of agricultural cooperatives, priority is given to community-based cooperatives. They will be formed within the administrative units, taking into account the factors of production specialization and concentration of the productive forces. Community-based cooperatives contribute to creating conditions for mass community engagement in the cooperative process, where economies of scale can be used and population’s ability and material resources can be capitalized on the ground, which is of particular importance for inclusive (comprehensive) entrepreneurship development. There are unique opportunities for organic production in the mountains of Georgia. The basis for the rational use of natural pasture lands in all vertical zones is the introduction of a system of plot-rotational or similar cattle grazing. Increasing the production of all types of food (green, juicy, coarse) on natural pasture lands, improving their quality and reducing the cost is the main basis for livestock development, because 65-75% of the cost of livestock products is related to feed costs. The organization of a single production cycle within the cooperative (stock feed for livestock, dairy and dairy products (including products produced on the place of origin: “dambalkhacho (a kind of blue cheese), stuffed cheese, sheep cheese), meat and meat products, wool and leather production) will ensure the rational use of grasslands, reduce feed costs and will significantly increase shareholder returns. In view of the diversity of non-timber forest products in the highlands of Georgia and the rapidly growing demands in international markets, wild-growing fruit picking (dog-rose, crab apple, cornel, sea buckthorn, etc.) within community cooperatives and developing their drying, storage and bio-production and sales at high prices have great potential. Creating a value chain for the production of non-timber forest products in Georgia would be ensured through supporting the strengthening of the organizational and technical-technological capabilities of the community-based cooperatives. The above model of the Highland Caucasus can be extended to all communities and villages after defining the status of village and rural entrepreneur (village as a territorial unit/vital area), which implies the transfer of the permanent ownership and use of state-owned land, forest, pasture, water and mineral resources to the communities. If this model is properly organized, the most complex military-political, economic and demographic problems related to the highland border sectors will be addressed without an additional financial cost to the State and changes in the internal territorial arrangement of the country. The people who live here will simultaneously act as guardians, border guards and farmers of the country. One of the primary objectives of State policy should be to encourage care and support of people living in rural areas, as well as to give them incentives to work (strengthening the authority of farming) in order to feed society.
以社区为基础的合作是恢复格鲁吉亚高地的有效机制
如果不加强农村地区和农业的活力,格鲁吉亚就不可能取得进步。农村社区的力量取决于制定和推行良好的公共政策。在格鲁吉亚独立的30年历史中,曾多次尝试推行旨在改善农村人民福利的区域政策。时间已经表明,为这个目的而设计的每一个战略或计划总是不系统和支离破碎的。结果,我们在格鲁吉亚获得了一个几乎不可逆转的农村人口外流过程,特别是在高地边境地区。格鲁吉亚的这些地区需要非常具体的办法。最接近格鲁吉亚文明起源的当地格鲁吉亚人在日常生活中仍然保持着许多世纪以来一直存在的习俗(以社区为基础使用和享受土地、合伙、社区)。为他们设计的公共支持项目的目标是创造条件,自然地鼓励人们在那里永久居住。我们认为,在我国海拔较高的地区建立特殊的经济实体是有利的,牧场和森林基金产生的收入将积累到这些实体中。在上述经济实体内,应在合作社的基础上发展农业生产,在合作社内组织单一的生产周期(初级产品的生产、加工和销售)。这类经济实体的所有者只能是永久居住在某一领土上的人。租赁或其他农业活动的收入只能根据民主决定用于改善生活条件的一般目的。这些目的可包括教育、保健、基础设施、运输等,这些目的将由格鲁吉亚政府预先确定。在确定农业合作社在当地地域范围的最优形式时,优先考虑社区合作社。在行政单位内部形成,要考虑到生产要素专业化和生产力集中的特点。以社区为基础的合作社有助于为大规模社区参与合作进程创造条件,在这种情况下,规模经济可以得到利用,人口的能力和物质资源可以在实地资本化,这对包容性(全面)创业发展尤为重要。在佐治亚州的山区有独特的有机生产机会。在所有垂直地带合理利用天然牧场的基础是实行轮作或类似放牧制度。在天然草场上增加各类食品(绿色、多汁、粗粮)的产量,提高其质量并降低成本是畜牧发展的主要基础,因为畜牧产品成本的65-75%与饲料成本有关。在合作社内组织单一的生产周期(牲畜的饲料、乳制品和乳制品(包括原产地生产的产品:丹巴尔哈乔(一种蓝奶酪)、填充奶酪、羊奶酪)、肉类和肉制品、羊毛和皮革生产)将确保合理利用草原,降低饲料成本,并将显著增加股东回报。鉴于格鲁吉亚高地非木材林产品的多样性和国际市场上迅速增长的需求,在社区合作社内采摘野生水果(狗玫瑰、山楂、山茱萸、沙棘等)并发展其干燥、储存和生物生产和高价销售具有很大的潜力。通过支持加强以社区为基础的合作社的组织和技术能力,将确保为格鲁吉亚非木材森林产品的生产创造一个价值链。高加索高地的上述模式可以推广到所有的社区和村庄,在定义了村庄和农村企业家(村庄作为一个领土单位/重要区域)的地位之后,这意味着将国有土地、森林、牧场、水和矿产资源的永久所有权和使用权转让给社区。如果这一模式组织得当,与高地边界地区有关的最复杂的军事、政治、经济和人口问题将得到解决,而不会给国家带来额外的财政费用,也不会改变该国的内部领土安排。居住在这里的人们将同时充当这个国家的守护者、边防警卫和农民。国家政策的主要目标之一应该是鼓励照顾和支持生活在农村地区的人,并鼓励他们工作(加强农业的权威),以便养活社会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信