Growing Like Germany: Local Public Debt, Local Banks, Low Private Investment

Mathias Hoffmann, Iryna Stewen, Michael Stiefel
{"title":"Growing Like Germany: Local Public Debt, Local Banks, Low Private Investment","authors":"Mathias Hoffmann, Iryna Stewen, Michael Stiefel","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3803224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using a firm-bank panel of more than 1m German firms over 2010-2016, we document that local public bank lending to municipalities crowds out private investment. Our results show how crowding-out can happen in a developed economy characterized by low interest rates and fiscal austerity. Our mechanism relies on two structural features of Germany’s banking landscape: First, the geographical segmentation of credit markets for small and medium firms (SME) which are dominated by local banks. Secondly, a special statutory mandate requiring local public banks to lend to municipalities. With yields on local government debt declining to all-time lows, local public banks tried to alleviate stress on their balance sheets by using their local market power to charge higher rates on their SME customers. This crowded out firm investment. Perversely, fiscal consolidation at the state and federal levels contributed to this effect by putting pressure on the budgets of municipal governments which increasingly borrowed from local public banks. Crowding-out lowered aggregate private investment by around 30-40 bio euros per year (or 1 percent of GDP). Thus, we identify a novel channel through which low interest rates can adversely affect bank lending and firm performance. Our results also illustrate how segmented credit markets can amplify negative multiplier effects from fiscal austerity.","PeriodicalId":376458,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Debt (Topic)","volume":"17 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Debt (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3803224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Using a firm-bank panel of more than 1m German firms over 2010-2016, we document that local public bank lending to municipalities crowds out private investment. Our results show how crowding-out can happen in a developed economy characterized by low interest rates and fiscal austerity. Our mechanism relies on two structural features of Germany’s banking landscape: First, the geographical segmentation of credit markets for small and medium firms (SME) which are dominated by local banks. Secondly, a special statutory mandate requiring local public banks to lend to municipalities. With yields on local government debt declining to all-time lows, local public banks tried to alleviate stress on their balance sheets by using their local market power to charge higher rates on their SME customers. This crowded out firm investment. Perversely, fiscal consolidation at the state and federal levels contributed to this effect by putting pressure on the budgets of municipal governments which increasingly borrowed from local public banks. Crowding-out lowered aggregate private investment by around 30-40 bio euros per year (or 1 percent of GDP). Thus, we identify a novel channel through which low interest rates can adversely affect bank lending and firm performance. Our results also illustrate how segmented credit markets can amplify negative multiplier effects from fiscal austerity.
像德国一样增长:地方公共债务,地方银行,低私人投资
通过对2010-2016年间超过100万家德国公司的企业-银行调查,我们发现地方公共银行向市政当局放贷挤掉了私人投资。我们的研究结果表明,在以低利率和财政紧缩为特征的发达经济体中,挤出是如何发生的。我们的机制依赖于德国银行业格局的两个结构特征:首先,由当地银行主导的中小企业(SME)信贷市场的地理分割。第二,一项特殊的法定授权,要求地方公共银行向市政当局放贷。随着地方政府债券收益率降至历史低点,地方公共银行试图利用其在当地的市场影响力,向中小企业客户收取更高的利率,以减轻其资产负债表上的压力。这挤掉了公司的投资。相反,州政府和联邦政府的财政整顿对市政府的预算施加了压力,从而加剧了这种影响,而市政府越来越多地从地方公共银行借款。挤出使私人投资总额每年减少约30-40亿欧元(或GDP的1%)。因此,我们确定了一个新的渠道,通过这个渠道,低利率可以对银行贷款和企业绩效产生不利影响。我们的研究结果还说明了分割的信贷市场如何放大财政紧缩带来的负面乘数效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信