M. Katz, Karl Kuhlemann, David Sherry, Monica Ugaglia
{"title":"Three case studies in current Leibniz scholarship","authors":"M. Katz, Karl Kuhlemann, David Sherry, Monica Ugaglia","doi":"10.14708/am.v15i1.7087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine some recent scholarship on Leibniz’s philosophy of the infinitesimal calculus. We indicate difficulties that arise in articles by Bassler, Knobloch, and Arthur, due to a denial to Leibniz’s infinitesimals of the status of mathematical entities violating Euclid V Definition 4.","PeriodicalId":165989,"journal":{"name":"Antiquitates Mathematicae","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antiquitates Mathematicae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14708/am.v15i1.7087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
We examine some recent scholarship on Leibniz’s philosophy of the infinitesimal calculus. We indicate difficulties that arise in articles by Bassler, Knobloch, and Arthur, due to a denial to Leibniz’s infinitesimals of the status of mathematical entities violating Euclid V Definition 4.