Co-participation of Community Advisory Group to develop, execute and disseminate a Covid-19 qualitative research study in India

Tuhina Rastogi, Divas Kumar, Harshpreet Kaur, D. Agarwal, Hans Wouters, A. Malpass
{"title":"Co-participation of Community Advisory Group to develop, execute and disseminate a Covid-19 qualitative research study in India","authors":"Tuhina Rastogi, Divas Kumar, Harshpreet Kaur, D. Agarwal, Hans Wouters, A. Malpass","doi":"10.21428/3d48c34a.5645e147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". This abstract describes the impact of engaging a community in a qualitative research on Covid-19 in India. This qualitative study aimed to understand the experiences of health-care providers in giving; and Covid-19 patients on receiving health-care in tertiary-care hospitals of India. Purpose of community engagement was to improve the design and methodology of the study and to build trust and transparency among the stakeholders. Methodology: The study team implemented a community engagement technique in the form of a community advisory group (CAG). The group comprised of relevant stakeholders (n=16) including physicians, nurses, policy makers/state health-representatives, Covid-19 patients and their caregivers. Throughout the research duration, CAG met thrice (i) study initiation (ii) progress and (iii) dissemination. The first CAG meeting was to engage members on research question, design and methodology. CAG met again after the data collection to provide different perspectives into the data interpretation. The last CAG meeting was to explore `non-traditional` dissemination techniques to expand reach of research findings and policymaking. Results: We used CAG to engage the community on the following levels of participation: informing community about research; consulting with them on methodology; involving them at every stage of research and collaborating with them to co-design and co-conduct research. Key CAG contributions included: refining the data collection guide to make it culturally-sensitive, helping co-design and refine data collection methodology and recruitment procedure, co-observing project progress and giving recommendations for dissemination. CAG was an essential tool in our research, through which the stakeholders shared lived experience and ensured the work was guided by a robust understanding of the stakeholders involved.","PeriodicalId":353726,"journal":{"name":"The Global Health Network Conference Proceedings 2022","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Global Health Network Conference Proceedings 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21428/3d48c34a.5645e147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

. This abstract describes the impact of engaging a community in a qualitative research on Covid-19 in India. This qualitative study aimed to understand the experiences of health-care providers in giving; and Covid-19 patients on receiving health-care in tertiary-care hospitals of India. Purpose of community engagement was to improve the design and methodology of the study and to build trust and transparency among the stakeholders. Methodology: The study team implemented a community engagement technique in the form of a community advisory group (CAG). The group comprised of relevant stakeholders (n=16) including physicians, nurses, policy makers/state health-representatives, Covid-19 patients and their caregivers. Throughout the research duration, CAG met thrice (i) study initiation (ii) progress and (iii) dissemination. The first CAG meeting was to engage members on research question, design and methodology. CAG met again after the data collection to provide different perspectives into the data interpretation. The last CAG meeting was to explore `non-traditional` dissemination techniques to expand reach of research findings and policymaking. Results: We used CAG to engage the community on the following levels of participation: informing community about research; consulting with them on methodology; involving them at every stage of research and collaborating with them to co-design and co-conduct research. Key CAG contributions included: refining the data collection guide to make it culturally-sensitive, helping co-design and refine data collection methodology and recruitment procedure, co-observing project progress and giving recommendations for dissemination. CAG was an essential tool in our research, through which the stakeholders shared lived experience and ensured the work was guided by a robust understanding of the stakeholders involved.
在印度共同参与社区咨询小组制定、执行和传播一项Covid-19定性研究
. 本摘要描述了让社区参与印度Covid-19定性研究的影响。本定性研究旨在了解卫生保健提供者在给予方面的经验;以及在印度三级医院接受医疗保健的Covid-19患者。社区参与的目的是改善研究的设计和方法,并在利益相关者之间建立信任和透明度。研究方法:研究小组以社区咨询小组(CAG)的形式实施了社区参与技术。该小组由相关利益攸关方(n=16)组成,包括医生、护士、政策制定者/州卫生代表、Covid-19患者及其护理人员。在整个研究期间,CAG进行了三次会议(i)研究启动(ii)进展和(iii)传播。CAG的第一次会议是让成员参与研究问题、设计和方法。CAG在数据收集后再次会面,为数据解释提供不同的视角。上次CAG会议的目的是探讨“非传统”传播技术,以扩大研究成果和决策的影响范围。结果:我们使用CAG在以下参与层面吸引社区参与:向社区通报研究;与他们就方法论进行磋商;让他们参与研究的每个阶段,并与他们合作,共同设计和共同开展研究。CAG的主要贡献包括:完善数据收集指南,使其具有文化敏感性,帮助共同设计和完善数据收集方法和招聘程序,共同观察项目进展情况,并为传播提供建议。CAG是我们研究中的一个重要工具,通过它,利益相关者分享了生活经验,并确保了对所涉及的利益相关者的充分理解指导了工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信