Chapter 4: Nonadaptivity as Inevitability

V. Petrovsky
{"title":"Chapter 4: Nonadaptivity as Inevitability","authors":"V. Petrovsky","doi":"10.1080/10610405.2021.1933831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nonadaptivity as inevitability. Analyzing the manifestations of a person’s vital relationship to the world, we first of all turn to the famous maxim of F. Engels: “To live means to die.” “The negation of life is essentially contained in life itself, so that life can always be understood in relation to its inevitable result, which is continually present in the embryo: death.” The “embryo” of death can, of course, be interpreted as a “goal” (“to die”). But naturally, the author of The Dialectics of Nature was far from a teleological interpretation of death, which he viewed as a result of life, in accordance with Hegel’s distinction between them. If that is so, then from this simple premise there follows an important conclusion for us: The life of the individuum as a totality cannot be represented in the form of progress toward any single original goal; the fundamental support for the postulate of congruity collapses, because the negation of life contained in life itself goes beyond what this postulate can explain.","PeriodicalId":308330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Russian & East European Psychology","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Russian & East European Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10610405.2021.1933831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nonadaptivity as inevitability. Analyzing the manifestations of a person’s vital relationship to the world, we first of all turn to the famous maxim of F. Engels: “To live means to die.” “The negation of life is essentially contained in life itself, so that life can always be understood in relation to its inevitable result, which is continually present in the embryo: death.” The “embryo” of death can, of course, be interpreted as a “goal” (“to die”). But naturally, the author of The Dialectics of Nature was far from a teleological interpretation of death, which he viewed as a result of life, in accordance with Hegel’s distinction between them. If that is so, then from this simple premise there follows an important conclusion for us: The life of the individuum as a totality cannot be represented in the form of progress toward any single original goal; the fundamental support for the postulate of congruity collapses, because the negation of life contained in life itself goes beyond what this postulate can explain.
第四章:作为必然性的非适应性
非适应性是不可避免的。分析一个人与世界的重要关系的表现,我们首先转向恩格斯的著名格言:“活着意味着死亡。”“生命的否定本质上包含在生命本身中,所以生命总是可以被理解为它不可避免的结果,它不断地出现在胚胎中:死亡。”当然,死亡的“胚胎”可以被解释为“目标”(“死亡”)。但自然地,《自然辩证法》的作者并没有对死亡进行目的论的解释,他认为死亡是生命的结果,这与黑格尔对两者的区分是一致的。如果是这样的话,那么从这个简单的前提中,我们就可以得出一个重要的结论:个人的生活作为一个整体,不能表现为向任何单一的原始目标前进的形式;对一致性假设的基本支持崩溃了,因为生命本身所包含的生命的否定超出了这个假设所能解释的范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信