Liberal Ironists and the "Gaudily Painted Savage": On Richard Rorty's Reading of Vladimir Nabokov

L. Toker
{"title":"Liberal Ironists and the \"Gaudily Painted Savage\": On Richard Rorty's Reading of Vladimir Nabokov","authors":"L. Toker","doi":"10.1353/NAB.2011.0082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The essay on Nabokov in Richard Rorty's Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity2 is important not only as a record of a powerful mind's journey of discovery but also as an implicit recognition that despite, or because of, Nabokov's rejection of affiliations and engagement, his works have captured some major issues on the modem cultural agenda—even if in ways not congenial to Rorty. Here, however, after discussing Rorty's valuable contribution to Nabokov's studies, I shall have to record a disagreement with some of his statements, or rather \"sentences,\" on Nabokov. Rorty may have expected some such protest. It is one of his central tenets that Truth does not exist \"out there,\" beyond and apart from our","PeriodicalId":110136,"journal":{"name":"Nabokov Studies","volume":"287 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nabokov Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/NAB.2011.0082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The essay on Nabokov in Richard Rorty's Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity2 is important not only as a record of a powerful mind's journey of discovery but also as an implicit recognition that despite, or because of, Nabokov's rejection of affiliations and engagement, his works have captured some major issues on the modem cultural agenda—even if in ways not congenial to Rorty. Here, however, after discussing Rorty's valuable contribution to Nabokov's studies, I shall have to record a disagreement with some of his statements, or rather "sentences," on Nabokov. Rorty may have expected some such protest. It is one of his central tenets that Truth does not exist "out there," beyond and apart from our
自由反讽主义者与“被俗丽描绘的野蛮人”——理查德·罗蒂对弗拉基米尔·纳博科夫的解读
理查德·罗蒂(Richard Rorty)的《偶然性、反讽与团结》(Contingency, Irony, and solidity2)中关于纳博科夫的文章很重要,不仅因为它记录了一个强大的心灵的发现之旅,还因为它含蓄地承认,尽管(或者因为)纳博科夫拒绝联系和参与,他的作品还是以与罗蒂不一致的方式抓住了现代文化中的一些主要问题agendaÂ-even。然而,在这里,在讨论了罗蒂对纳博科夫研究的宝贵贡献之后,我必须记录下我对他关于纳博科夫的一些陈述,或者更确切地说是“句子”的不同意见。罗蒂可能预料到了一些这样的抗议。他的核心信条之一是,真理并不存在于“外面”,不在我们的世界之外
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信