Functions and duties of the forensic electrical engineer

G. Parise, L. Parise, M. Lombardi, E. Hesla, Massimo Mitolo, C. Mardegan
{"title":"Functions and duties of the forensic electrical engineer","authors":"G. Parise, L. Parise, M. Lombardi, E. Hesla, Massimo Mitolo, C. Mardegan","doi":"10.1109/ICPS.2016.7490237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Forensic engineers have several duties, in some cases to be performed in conflictual situations (e.g. depositions). The competencies of the forensic electrical engineer include the knowledge of engineering standards and best practices, familiarity with applicable laws and regulations, as well as wise decision making. In this paper, functions and duties of the forensic electrical engineer preparing for a trial are discussed and quantitative methods of technical evaluation are proposed. Around the world, institutions establish and define the competencies of the forensic engineer, and promote the advancement of the forensic science through conferences, and publications. To resolve the historical dichotomy between the logic of the \"certainty\" required by the judicial outcome of proceedings, and the logic of the \"uncertainty\" of the engineering, this paper suggests utilizing the subdivision of accident-related trials, when a risk assessment must be provided, into two levels; a junior \"engineering\" level (which may be public is some jurisdictions, confidential in others), followed by a senior level or formal trial, might together better support the formulation of the verdict by providing a more exhaustive analysis of the accident causation, and parties' responsibilities. Key words: forensic science, logic of certainty and uncertainty, fuzzy logic, technical investigation, cindynic model.","PeriodicalId":266558,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE/IAS 52nd Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Technical Conference (I&CPS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE/IAS 52nd Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Technical Conference (I&CPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPS.2016.7490237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Forensic engineers have several duties, in some cases to be performed in conflictual situations (e.g. depositions). The competencies of the forensic electrical engineer include the knowledge of engineering standards and best practices, familiarity with applicable laws and regulations, as well as wise decision making. In this paper, functions and duties of the forensic electrical engineer preparing for a trial are discussed and quantitative methods of technical evaluation are proposed. Around the world, institutions establish and define the competencies of the forensic engineer, and promote the advancement of the forensic science through conferences, and publications. To resolve the historical dichotomy between the logic of the "certainty" required by the judicial outcome of proceedings, and the logic of the "uncertainty" of the engineering, this paper suggests utilizing the subdivision of accident-related trials, when a risk assessment must be provided, into two levels; a junior "engineering" level (which may be public is some jurisdictions, confidential in others), followed by a senior level or formal trial, might together better support the formulation of the verdict by providing a more exhaustive analysis of the accident causation, and parties' responsibilities. Key words: forensic science, logic of certainty and uncertainty, fuzzy logic, technical investigation, cindynic model.
法医电气工程师的职能和职责
法医工程师有几项职责,在某些情况下要在冲突情况下执行(例如取证)。法医电气工程师的能力包括工程标准和最佳实践的知识,熟悉适用的法律法规,以及明智的决策。本文论述了审前法医学电气工程师的职能和职责,提出了技术评价的定量化方法。在世界各地,机构建立和定义法医工程师的能力,并通过会议和出版物促进法医学的进步。为了解决诉讼结果所要求的“确定性”逻辑与工程结果所要求的“不确定性”逻辑之间的历史二分法,本文建议在必须提供风险评估的情况下,将事故相关审判细分为两个层次;初级的“工程”级别(在某些司法管辖区可能是公开的,在其他司法管辖区可能是保密的),然后是高级级别或正式的审判,通过提供对事故原因和各方责任的更详尽的分析,可能更好地支持判决的形成。关键词:法医学,确定性与不确定性逻辑,模糊逻辑,技术侦查,动态模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信