Factors that may impair the walkability of students on the route between the Alencastro urban public transport station and the Federal Institute of Mato Grosso (Cuiabá Campus)

Yanne Emelyn da Silva Souza, Renata Cardoso Magagnin
{"title":"Factors that may impair the walkability of students on the route between the Alencastro urban public transport station and the Federal Institute of Mato Grosso (Cuiabá Campus)","authors":"Yanne Emelyn da Silva Souza, Renata Cardoso Magagnin","doi":"10.17271/23188472107920223293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, a large number of people move around cities on foot. But few municipalities have a detailed diagnosis of this infrastructure quality, especially around school areas. Given this reality, this article aims to present the results of a study that evaluated the factors that affect the walkability of students on the route between the Alencastro Urban Public Transportation Station to the Federal Institute of Mato Grosso (Cuiabá Campus). The methodology consisted of applying the walkability index (ICam) developed by the Institute for Transportation and Development Policies (ITDP Brazil) in 2018, which allows the following themes to be evaluated: sidewalk, mobility, attractiveness, public safety, road safety, and environment. The results show that the evaluated path needs some priority interventions related mainly to the themes Public Safety and Attractiveness, with short-term actions that should be implemented by the local public authorities. And the results show that the methodology used is easy to use and thus can contribute to the development of similar studies.","PeriodicalId":250730,"journal":{"name":"Revista Nacional de Gerenciamento de Cidades","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Nacional de Gerenciamento de Cidades","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17271/23188472107920223293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Currently, a large number of people move around cities on foot. But few municipalities have a detailed diagnosis of this infrastructure quality, especially around school areas. Given this reality, this article aims to present the results of a study that evaluated the factors that affect the walkability of students on the route between the Alencastro Urban Public Transportation Station to the Federal Institute of Mato Grosso (Cuiabá Campus). The methodology consisted of applying the walkability index (ICam) developed by the Institute for Transportation and Development Policies (ITDP Brazil) in 2018, which allows the following themes to be evaluated: sidewalk, mobility, attractiveness, public safety, road safety, and environment. The results show that the evaluated path needs some priority interventions related mainly to the themes Public Safety and Attractiveness, with short-term actions that should be implemented by the local public authorities. And the results show that the methodology used is easy to use and thus can contribute to the development of similar studies.
可能影响学生在Alencastro城市公共交通站和马托格罗索联邦学院(cuiab校区)之间路线上的步行性的因素
目前,很多人在城市里步行。但很少有市政当局对基础设施质量进行详细的诊断,尤其是在学校附近。鉴于这一现实,本文旨在介绍一项研究的结果,该研究评估了影响学生在Alencastro城市公共交通站到马托格罗索联邦学院(cuiab校区)之间路线上步行的因素。该方法包括应用交通与发展政策研究所(ITDP巴西)于2018年开发的步行指数(ICam),该指数允许评估以下主题:人行道、流动性、吸引力、公共安全、道路安全和环境。结果表明,评估路径需要一些优先干预措施,主要涉及公共安全和吸引力主题,并应由地方公共当局实施短期行动。结果表明,所采用的方法简单易行,可为同类研究的发展做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信