{"title":"„Zagrebačke teme“ u formativnom periodu Srpskog književnog glasnika (1920. – 1921.)","authors":"Gordana Krivokapić Jović","doi":"10.17234/desnicini_susreti2018.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary : While making a content analysis of the Serbian Literary Gazette ( Srpski književni glasnik ) in its formative period (1920–1921), after its new series was launched, quite a lot of themes related to Zagreb came out of it. Th ey have been contextualized having in mind a profi le of the review, personalities who established it and their cultural and political priorities, as well as leading ideas which brought them together. Th e most productive contributors have been identifi es, as well as standpoints they have been advocating in an atmosphere of mutual, Serbo-Craotian misunder-standings and willingness to look for alternative approaches in both directions in order to surpass those misunderstandings.","PeriodicalId":386432,"journal":{"name":"Zagreb 1924. – 1930. i 1945. – 1967. Društvo, kultura, svakodnevica: Znanstveni skup s međunarodnim sudjelovanjem Desničini susreti 2018.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zagreb 1924. – 1930. i 1945. – 1967. Društvo, kultura, svakodnevica: Znanstveni skup s međunarodnim sudjelovanjem Desničini susreti 2018.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17234/desnicini_susreti2018.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Summary : While making a content analysis of the Serbian Literary Gazette ( Srpski književni glasnik ) in its formative period (1920–1921), after its new series was launched, quite a lot of themes related to Zagreb came out of it. Th ey have been contextualized having in mind a profi le of the review, personalities who established it and their cultural and political priorities, as well as leading ideas which brought them together. Th e most productive contributors have been identifi es, as well as standpoints they have been advocating in an atmosphere of mutual, Serbo-Craotian misunder-standings and willingness to look for alternative approaches in both directions in order to surpass those misunderstandings.