Performance comparison of GCC and LLVM on the EISC processor

Chanhyun Park, Miseon Han, Hokyoon Lee, S. Kim
{"title":"Performance comparison of GCC and LLVM on the EISC processor","authors":"Chanhyun Park, Miseon Han, Hokyoon Lee, S. Kim","doi":"10.1109/ELINFOCOM.2014.6914394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In embedded systems, code size and dynamic instruction count are important performance indicators of power consumption and execution time. However, the use of different compilers may result in large different performance values even if a target machine is the same. So, the compiler selection in the system development is very important. In this paper, we compare the performances of two popular compilers, GCC and LLVM in perspective of the code size and the dynamic instruction count for the EISC embedded processor. Our comparison shows that LLVM is good at optimizing calculation intensive benchmarks, and GCC performs register allocation and jump optimization better. Overall, the GCC compiler shows better performance in most EEMBC benchmarks about 18% on average in terms of dynamic instruction. Also, the compiled code size by GCC is smaller than that of LLVM by 4% on average.","PeriodicalId":360207,"journal":{"name":"2014 International Conference on Electronics, Information and Communications (ICEIC)","volume":"434 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 International Conference on Electronics, Information and Communications (ICEIC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ELINFOCOM.2014.6914394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In embedded systems, code size and dynamic instruction count are important performance indicators of power consumption and execution time. However, the use of different compilers may result in large different performance values even if a target machine is the same. So, the compiler selection in the system development is very important. In this paper, we compare the performances of two popular compilers, GCC and LLVM in perspective of the code size and the dynamic instruction count for the EISC embedded processor. Our comparison shows that LLVM is good at optimizing calculation intensive benchmarks, and GCC performs register allocation and jump optimization better. Overall, the GCC compiler shows better performance in most EEMBC benchmarks about 18% on average in terms of dynamic instruction. Also, the compiled code size by GCC is smaller than that of LLVM by 4% on average.
GCC和LLVM在EISC处理器上的性能比较
在嵌入式系统中,代码大小和动态指令数是功耗和执行时间的重要性能指标。然而,即使目标机器相同,使用不同的编译器也可能导致性能值的巨大差异。因此,在系统开发中,编译器的选择是非常重要的。在本文中,我们从代码大小和动态指令数的角度比较了两种流行的编译器GCC和LLVM在EISC嵌入式处理器上的性能。我们的比较表明,LLVM擅长优化计算密集型基准测试,而GCC更擅长执行寄存器分配和跳转优化。总的来说,GCC编译器在大多数EEMBC基准测试中表现出更好的性能,在动态指令方面平均提高了18%。此外,GCC编译的代码大小比LLVM平均小4%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信