The Virtuous Hospital: A Catholic Organizational Healthcare Ethics

D. Daly
{"title":"The Virtuous Hospital: A Catholic Organizational Healthcare Ethics","authors":"D. Daly","doi":"10.22461/jhea.1.71635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper addresses a perennial problem in Catholic organizational healthcare ethics. Catholic and secular ethicists have acknowledged that organizational healthcare ethics is underdeveloped. Scholars have traditionally focused on the “micro” issues arising in the clinical setting or the “macro” issues of national healthcare policy and health insurance. The “meso” or healthcare organizational level, involving both healthcare systems and hospitals has received far less attention. As a result, contemporary organizational healthcare ethics lacks a developed conceptual framework with which to analyze and guide the decision-making of HCOs. The paper responds to two specific deficiencies in the field. First, organizational ethics undertheorizes sociological realities. Second, the field employs exceedingly thin and incoherent ethical frameworks. Although scholars have introduced the term \"organizational virtue,\" they have yet to develop a robust account of the concept leaving healthcare leaders incapable of assessing organizational character or guiding moral decision-making. In sum, because neither \"organization\" nor \"ethics\" is well articulated, the entire project of organizational healthcare ethics loses its capacity to explain, guide, and assess human action and social outcomes. The paper directly addresses these deficiencies. First, it offers greater precision in the use of sociological terminologies, such as \"structure,\" \"institution,\" \"organization,\" and \"culture.\" Using critical realist social theory, the paper distinguishes between a social structure in the general sense, which is a “web of relations among social positions,” and an organization, which is a highly complex social structure containing positions of authority. Next, it synthesizes organizational theory with virtue theory to develop an account of organizational virtue ethics capable of aiding in organizational moral decision-making and assessment. It then articulates cardinal organizational virtues, including organizational prudence, justice, beneficence, and solidarity. The paper then applies the cardinal organizational virtues to a composite case.","PeriodicalId":164934,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Healthcare Ethics & Administration","volume":"219 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Healthcare Ethics & Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22461/jhea.1.71635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper addresses a perennial problem in Catholic organizational healthcare ethics. Catholic and secular ethicists have acknowledged that organizational healthcare ethics is underdeveloped. Scholars have traditionally focused on the “micro” issues arising in the clinical setting or the “macro” issues of national healthcare policy and health insurance. The “meso” or healthcare organizational level, involving both healthcare systems and hospitals has received far less attention. As a result, contemporary organizational healthcare ethics lacks a developed conceptual framework with which to analyze and guide the decision-making of HCOs. The paper responds to two specific deficiencies in the field. First, organizational ethics undertheorizes sociological realities. Second, the field employs exceedingly thin and incoherent ethical frameworks. Although scholars have introduced the term "organizational virtue," they have yet to develop a robust account of the concept leaving healthcare leaders incapable of assessing organizational character or guiding moral decision-making. In sum, because neither "organization" nor "ethics" is well articulated, the entire project of organizational healthcare ethics loses its capacity to explain, guide, and assess human action and social outcomes. The paper directly addresses these deficiencies. First, it offers greater precision in the use of sociological terminologies, such as "structure," "institution," "organization," and "culture." Using critical realist social theory, the paper distinguishes between a social structure in the general sense, which is a “web of relations among social positions,” and an organization, which is a highly complex social structure containing positions of authority. Next, it synthesizes organizational theory with virtue theory to develop an account of organizational virtue ethics capable of aiding in organizational moral decision-making and assessment. It then articulates cardinal organizational virtues, including organizational prudence, justice, beneficence, and solidarity. The paper then applies the cardinal organizational virtues to a composite case.
美德医院:天主教组织医疗伦理
本文解决了天主教组织卫生保健伦理的一个长期问题。天主教和世俗伦理学家都承认,组织卫生保健伦理是不发达的。传统上,学者们关注的是临床环境中出现的“微观”问题或国家医疗政策和医疗保险的“宏观”问题。涉及医疗保健系统和医院的“中观”或医疗保健组织层面受到的关注要少得多。因此,当代组织卫生保健伦理缺乏一个发达的概念框架来分析和指导卫生保健组织的决策。本文回应了该领域的两个具体缺陷。首先,组织伦理低估了社会学现实。其次,该领域采用了极其单薄和不连贯的伦理框架。尽管学者们引入了“组织美德”一词,但他们尚未对这一概念进行强有力的解释,这使得医疗保健领导者无法评估组织特征或指导道德决策。总之,由于“组织”和“伦理”都没有很好地表达,整个组织医疗保健伦理项目失去了解释、指导和评估人类行为和社会结果的能力。本文直接解决了这些缺陷。首先,它更精确地使用了社会学术语,如“结构”、“制度”、“组织”和“文化”。运用批判现实主义社会理论,本文区分了一般意义上的社会结构和组织,前者是“社会地位之间的关系网络”,后者是包含权威地位的高度复杂的社会结构。其次,将组织理论与德性理论相结合,形成一种有助于组织道德决策与评价的组织德性伦理解释。然后,它阐明了组织的基本美德,包括组织的审慎、公正、仁慈和团结。然后,本文将基本组织美德应用于一个综合案例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信