Comparison of AngularJS framework testing tools

Nina Fat, Marijana Vujovic, I. Papp, S. Novak
{"title":"Comparison of AngularJS framework testing tools","authors":"Nina Fat, Marijana Vujovic, I. Papp, S. Novak","doi":"10.1109/ZINC.2016.7513659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AngularJS, the new Javascript framework, with wide usage across web browsers and great expression power, comes with a shortcoming - lack of compiler optimization. Consequently it is strongly recommended that every application written in JavaScript, regardless of the used framework, should include tests that validate both its behavior and performance. This paper presents and evaluates two popular web automation testing frameworks: Protractor and Karma. As an addition to the description of testing frameworks in this paper, we present the results of running tests on optimized and unoptimized web application used in real systems.","PeriodicalId":125652,"journal":{"name":"2016 Zooming Innovation in Consumer Electronics International Conference (ZINC)","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Zooming Innovation in Consumer Electronics International Conference (ZINC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ZINC.2016.7513659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

AngularJS, the new Javascript framework, with wide usage across web browsers and great expression power, comes with a shortcoming - lack of compiler optimization. Consequently it is strongly recommended that every application written in JavaScript, regardless of the used framework, should include tests that validate both its behavior and performance. This paper presents and evaluates two popular web automation testing frameworks: Protractor and Karma. As an addition to the description of testing frameworks in this paper, we present the results of running tests on optimized and unoptimized web application used in real systems.
AngularJS框架测试工具的比较
AngularJS是一个新的Javascript框架,广泛应用于web浏览器和强大的表达式能力,但它有一个缺点——缺乏编译器优化。因此,强烈建议每个用JavaScript编写的应用程序,无论使用什么框架,都应该包含验证其行为和性能的测试。本文介绍并评估了两个流行的web自动化测试框架:Protractor和Karma。作为本文测试框架描述的补充,我们给出了在实际系统中使用的优化和未优化的web应用程序上运行测试的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信