Transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy

F. Alsaif, A. Madkhali, F. Bamehriz, H. Alsubaie, S. Althuwaini, Abdulah Aldohayan
{"title":"Transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy","authors":"F. Alsaif, A. Madkhali, F. Bamehriz, H. Alsubaie, S. Althuwaini, Abdulah Aldohayan","doi":"10.4103/SJL.SJL_2_18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Single port surgery and transumbilical surgery are progressing rapidly. The advantages of the cosmetic appearance of this surgery encourages the surgeon to do it which has good acceptance from the patients. Moreover transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy has the miratus of the single port surgery and traditional laparoscopic surgery. Single port surgery seemed to be expensive more than traditional laparoscopic surgery. Transumbilical Laparoscopic surgery is a rapidly evolving field as a bridge between traditional laparoscopic surgery and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Aim: Hereby, we report of the initial clinical experiences in Saudi Arabia with this new technique. Ten cases of gallbladder stone are selected for this new technique. Materials and Methods: Tow curved intra-umbilical incision was made with 5mm port for camera (30 degree angle) and 8mm working port. Two separate incision 2mm each at right upper quadrant. Dissection was performed using an electric cautery hook and an endograsper. Result: Nine out of ten procedures were completed successfully and one case converted to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy because acutely inflamed. Average operative time 48 min with minimal blood loss. Postoperative follow-up did not reveal any umbilical wound complication. Conclusion: Therefore, transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy is feasible and a promising alternative method as less scar in abdominal surgery for the treatment of some patients with gallbladder stone. No extra cost or special instruments are used. Moreover, we reduce the risk of the post single port hernia surgery.","PeriodicalId":388688,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Laparoscopy","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Laparoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/SJL.SJL_2_18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Single port surgery and transumbilical surgery are progressing rapidly. The advantages of the cosmetic appearance of this surgery encourages the surgeon to do it which has good acceptance from the patients. Moreover transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy has the miratus of the single port surgery and traditional laparoscopic surgery. Single port surgery seemed to be expensive more than traditional laparoscopic surgery. Transumbilical Laparoscopic surgery is a rapidly evolving field as a bridge between traditional laparoscopic surgery and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Aim: Hereby, we report of the initial clinical experiences in Saudi Arabia with this new technique. Ten cases of gallbladder stone are selected for this new technique. Materials and Methods: Tow curved intra-umbilical incision was made with 5mm port for camera (30 degree angle) and 8mm working port. Two separate incision 2mm each at right upper quadrant. Dissection was performed using an electric cautery hook and an endograsper. Result: Nine out of ten procedures were completed successfully and one case converted to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy because acutely inflamed. Average operative time 48 min with minimal blood loss. Postoperative follow-up did not reveal any umbilical wound complication. Conclusion: Therefore, transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy is feasible and a promising alternative method as less scar in abdominal surgery for the treatment of some patients with gallbladder stone. No extra cost or special instruments are used. Moreover, we reduce the risk of the post single port hernia surgery.
经脐腹腔镜胆囊切除术
背景:单孔手术和经脐手术发展迅速。这种手术的美容外观的优点鼓励外科医生去做,并得到了患者的良好接受。而且经脐腹腔镜胆囊切除术具有单孔手术和传统腹腔镜手术的异同。单端口手术似乎比传统的腹腔镜手术更昂贵。经脐腹腔镜手术是一个快速发展的领域,是传统腹腔镜手术和自然孔腔内镜手术之间的桥梁。目的:在此,我们报告在沙特阿拉伯使用这种新技术的初步临床经验。选择了10例胆囊结石患者进行这项新技术。材料与方法:制作2个脐内弯曲切口,5mm摄像口(30度角)和8mm工作口。右上象限两个独立切口,各2mm。使用电灼钩和内抓器进行解剖。结果:10例手术中9例成功完成,1例因急性炎症转行常规腹腔镜胆囊切除术。平均手术时间48分钟,出血量最小。术后随访未见脐部创面并发症。结论:经脐腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗部分胆囊结石是可行的,是腹部手术中瘢痕较少的一种有希望的替代方法。无需额外费用或使用特殊仪器。此外,我们降低了单端口疝手术后的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信