Comparison between Suprachoroidal Triamcinolone and Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide in patients of resistant Diabetic Macular Edema

Kaleemullah Shaikh, Nasir Ahmed, Umer Kazi, A. Zia, Muhammad Zunair Aziz
{"title":"Comparison between Suprachoroidal Triamcinolone and Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide in patients of resistant Diabetic Macular Edema","authors":"Kaleemullah Shaikh, Nasir Ahmed, Umer Kazi, A. Zia, Muhammad Zunair Aziz","doi":"10.36351/pjo.v39i1.1480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose:  To compare the effectiveness and safety of suprachoroidal versus intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide in cases of resistant diabetic macular edema.\nStudy Design:  Quasi experimental study.\nPlace and Duration of Study:  This research was executed at Retina Department of Al-Ibrahim Eye Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan between 1st January 2022 till 30th June 2022.\nMethods:  Thirty-four patients with resistant diabetic macular edema were selected through convenient sampling and divided equally into two groups. All patients underwent ocular examination. Group I was given single Intravitreal injection (IVI) of 0.1 mL Triamcinolone Acetonide at 4 mg per 0.1 mL concentration. Group II received same dosage of drug via Suprachoroidal injection (SCI). After 24 hours, they were assessed for side effects. After 6 weeks, second dose of same drug was administered. Patients were followed at 3 and 6 months.\nResults:  No serious side effect was observed in any patient within 24 hours. At 1 month follow-up period, comparison between the two groups for BCVA, CMT and IOP was not significant (p > 0.05). When the two groups were compared at 3 months, both routes were equally effective but IOP remained more stable via SCI route. At 6 months, IOP remained elevated in group I but decreased in group II (p = 0.003).\nConclusion:  Triamcinolone Acetonide was effective by both routes in resistant diabetic macular edema in terms of improved BCVA and CMT but SCI was better in terms of IOP and cataract progression.","PeriodicalId":169886,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36351/pjo.v39i1.1480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose:  To compare the effectiveness and safety of suprachoroidal versus intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide in cases of resistant diabetic macular edema. Study Design:  Quasi experimental study. Place and Duration of Study:  This research was executed at Retina Department of Al-Ibrahim Eye Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan between 1st January 2022 till 30th June 2022. Methods:  Thirty-four patients with resistant diabetic macular edema were selected through convenient sampling and divided equally into two groups. All patients underwent ocular examination. Group I was given single Intravitreal injection (IVI) of 0.1 mL Triamcinolone Acetonide at 4 mg per 0.1 mL concentration. Group II received same dosage of drug via Suprachoroidal injection (SCI). After 24 hours, they were assessed for side effects. After 6 weeks, second dose of same drug was administered. Patients were followed at 3 and 6 months. Results:  No serious side effect was observed in any patient within 24 hours. At 1 month follow-up period, comparison between the two groups for BCVA, CMT and IOP was not significant (p > 0.05). When the two groups were compared at 3 months, both routes were equally effective but IOP remained more stable via SCI route. At 6 months, IOP remained elevated in group I but decreased in group II (p = 0.003). Conclusion:  Triamcinolone Acetonide was effective by both routes in resistant diabetic macular edema in terms of improved BCVA and CMT but SCI was better in terms of IOP and cataract progression.
脉络膜上曲安奈德与玻璃体内曲安奈德治疗难治性糖尿病黄斑水肿的比较
目的:比较曲安奈德在难治性糖尿病黄斑水肿中的有效性和安全性。研究设计:准实验研究。研究地点和时间:本研究于2022年1月1日至2022年6月30日在巴基斯坦卡拉奇Al-Ibrahim眼科医院视网膜部进行。方法:采用方便抽样的方法,选择34例难治性糖尿病黄斑水肿患者,随机分为两组。所有患者均行眼部检查。ⅰ组患者给予单次玻璃体内注射曲安奈德0.1 mL,每0.1 mL浓度注射4 mg。II组患者给予等量脉络膜上注射(SCI)。24小时后,评估他们的副作用。6周后,第二次给药。随访时间分别为3个月和6个月。结果:24小时内无严重副作用。随访1个月时,两组患者BCVA、CMT、IOP比较无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。当两组在3个月时进行比较时,两种途径都同样有效,但通过SCI途径IOP保持更稳定。6个月时,I组IOP升高,II组IOP降低(p = 0.003)。结论:曲安奈德治疗顽固性糖尿病黄斑水肿在改善BCVA和CMT方面均有效,而SCI治疗在IOP和白内障进展方面效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信