Quantifying the Performance of Wireless Data Acquisition System to Assess Upper Limb Spasticity

Nurul Atiqah Othman, N. Zakaria, F. A. Hanapiah, N. M. Hashim, Khairunnisa Johar, C. Y. Low, J. Yee
{"title":"Quantifying the Performance of Wireless Data Acquisition System to Assess Upper Limb Spasticity","authors":"Nurul Atiqah Othman, N. Zakaria, F. A. Hanapiah, N. M. Hashim, Khairunnisa Johar, C. Y. Low, J. Yee","doi":"10.1109/ROMA55875.2022.9915667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Performance of a data acquisition system is very important to ensure consistency of the device in collecting quantitative data from patient with spasticity. This study is conducted by two raters with different years of experience, using Wireless Data Acquisition Systems from Biometrics Ltd in compliance with Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) as a measurement tool. Clinical data from 6 samples of patient with spasticity with different MAS score were analyzed using (i) Levene’s test to compare the quantitative data by analyzing the homogeneity of the variance and, (ii) Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC) to determine the correlation of force exerted by the raters during clinical assessment. Objectives of this study are, (i) to evaluate the variance of the equality of the quantitative data, and (ii) to define the correlation of force exerted between Rater 1 and Rater 2. From the conducted research, the homogeneity of angle variance and force is not significant due to inconsistence stretch period during slow and fast stretch. The r-score from PCC analysis for force is showing an unsatisfied correlation due to the different force exerted by the rater. Consequently, an experienced rater has an important role in assisting patients with spasticity. Withstanding by the result obtained, the Wireless Data Acquisition Systems by Biometrics Ltd is attested to be a data acquisition system for clinical usage. It is suggested to improve the quantitative data by increase the number of patients with spasticity.","PeriodicalId":121458,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 5th International Symposium in Robotics and Manufacturing Automation (ROMA)","volume":"509 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 5th International Symposium in Robotics and Manufacturing Automation (ROMA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMA55875.2022.9915667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Performance of a data acquisition system is very important to ensure consistency of the device in collecting quantitative data from patient with spasticity. This study is conducted by two raters with different years of experience, using Wireless Data Acquisition Systems from Biometrics Ltd in compliance with Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) as a measurement tool. Clinical data from 6 samples of patient with spasticity with different MAS score were analyzed using (i) Levene’s test to compare the quantitative data by analyzing the homogeneity of the variance and, (ii) Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC) to determine the correlation of force exerted by the raters during clinical assessment. Objectives of this study are, (i) to evaluate the variance of the equality of the quantitative data, and (ii) to define the correlation of force exerted between Rater 1 and Rater 2. From the conducted research, the homogeneity of angle variance and force is not significant due to inconsistence stretch period during slow and fast stretch. The r-score from PCC analysis for force is showing an unsatisfied correlation due to the different force exerted by the rater. Consequently, an experienced rater has an important role in assisting patients with spasticity. Withstanding by the result obtained, the Wireless Data Acquisition Systems by Biometrics Ltd is attested to be a data acquisition system for clinical usage. It is suggested to improve the quantitative data by increase the number of patients with spasticity.
量化无线数据采集系统评估上肢痉挛的性能
数据采集系统的性能对于确保设备在收集痉挛患者定量数据时的一致性非常重要。本研究由两名具有不同工作经验的评分员进行,使用biometics有限公司的无线数据采集系统(Wireless Data Acquisition Systems),并采用改良Ashworth量表(MAS)作为测量工具。对6例MAS评分不同的痉挛患者的临床资料进行分析,采用(i) Levene检验,通过分析方差的齐性来比较定量数据;(ii) Pearson相关系数(PCC)来确定评分者在临床评估时所施加的力的相关性。本研究的目的是(i)评估定量数据相等性的方差,(ii)确定Rater 1和Rater 2之间施加的力的相关性。从研究结果来看,在慢速拉伸和快速拉伸过程中,由于拉伸时间不一致,角度方差和力的均匀性不显著。力的PCC分析的r-score显示出不满意的相关性,由于不同的力施加的评级。因此,经验丰富的评分员在帮助痉挛患者方面起着重要的作用。尽管获得的结果,无线数据采集系统由Biometrics有限公司被证明是一种临床使用的数据采集系统。建议通过增加痉挛患者的数量来改善定量数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信