Toad in the Hole or Mapo Tofu? Comparative Analysis of English and Chinese Darknet Markets

Yichao Wang, B. Arief, J. Castro
{"title":"Toad in the Hole or Mapo Tofu? Comparative Analysis of English and Chinese Darknet Markets","authors":"Yichao Wang, B. Arief, J. Castro","doi":"10.1109/eCrime54498.2021.9738745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The popularity of online shopping and cryptocurrency has contributed to drive the economy of darknet markets in recent years. These are often perceived to be conducive to (or may even facilitate) cybercrime related activities. It is, therefore, worthwhile to have a deeper understanding of how various darknet markets operate, so that researchers and law enforcement agencies can test and deploy appropriate countermeasures to fight against online crime. Currently, there is a knowledge gap regarding the similarities and differences among darknet markets in different languages. This study aims to compare between darknet markets operating in English and Chinese. Data from three English and two Chinese darknet markets was collected. The gathered data is described, compared, and analysed in six main aspects: operation model and structures, product categories, market policies, payment methods, security mechanisms, and vendors’ characteristics. Our datasets were collected during a seven-week period between 17 July and 30 August 2021, and they contain data from 384 vendors in the English darknet markets and 4,429 in the Chinese ones. The Chinese darknet markets generally seem to have more liberal policies than their English counterparts, as demonstrated by the variety and types of goods and services offered, many of which would have been banned in the English speaking ones. All darknet markets suffer from reputation issues. Cross-market actors are active, but they represent only a small proportion of the vendors observed in our study. In summary, our findings reveal key characteristics of darknet markets in two widely used languages. This information can provide useful insights for security researchers and law enforcement agencies in combating cybercrime.","PeriodicalId":228129,"journal":{"name":"2021 APWG Symposium on Electronic Crime Research (eCrime)","volume":"1184 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 APWG Symposium on Electronic Crime Research (eCrime)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/eCrime54498.2021.9738745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The popularity of online shopping and cryptocurrency has contributed to drive the economy of darknet markets in recent years. These are often perceived to be conducive to (or may even facilitate) cybercrime related activities. It is, therefore, worthwhile to have a deeper understanding of how various darknet markets operate, so that researchers and law enforcement agencies can test and deploy appropriate countermeasures to fight against online crime. Currently, there is a knowledge gap regarding the similarities and differences among darknet markets in different languages. This study aims to compare between darknet markets operating in English and Chinese. Data from three English and two Chinese darknet markets was collected. The gathered data is described, compared, and analysed in six main aspects: operation model and structures, product categories, market policies, payment methods, security mechanisms, and vendors’ characteristics. Our datasets were collected during a seven-week period between 17 July and 30 August 2021, and they contain data from 384 vendors in the English darknet markets and 4,429 in the Chinese ones. The Chinese darknet markets generally seem to have more liberal policies than their English counterparts, as demonstrated by the variety and types of goods and services offered, many of which would have been banned in the English speaking ones. All darknet markets suffer from reputation issues. Cross-market actors are active, but they represent only a small proportion of the vendors observed in our study. In summary, our findings reveal key characteristics of darknet markets in two widely used languages. This information can provide useful insights for security researchers and law enforcement agencies in combating cybercrime.
洞里蟾蜍还是麻婆豆腐?中英文暗网市场比较分析
近年来,网上购物和加密货币的普及推动了暗网市场的经济发展。这些通常被认为有利于(甚至可能促进)网络犯罪相关活动。因此,有必要深入了解各种暗网市场的运作方式,以便研究人员和执法机构可以测试和部署适当的对策来打击网络犯罪。目前,关于不同语言的暗网市场之间的异同存在知识差距。本研究旨在比较英文和中文暗网市场。收集到的数据主要从六个方面进行描述、比较和分析:运营模式和结构、产品类别、市场政策、支付方式、安全机制和供应商特征。我们的数据集是在2021年7月17日至8月30日的7周期间收集的,其中包含来自英国暗网市场的384家供应商和中国暗网市场的4429家供应商的数据。中国的暗网市场通常比英国的暗网市场有更自由的政策,所提供的商品和服务的种类和类型证明了这一点,其中许多商品和服务在英语国家是被禁止的。所有暗网市场都存在声誉问题。跨市场参与者是活跃的,但他们只占我们研究中观察到的供应商的一小部分。总之,我们的研究结果揭示了两种广泛使用语言的暗网市场的关键特征。这些信息可以为安全研究人员和执法机构打击网络犯罪提供有用的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信