Ryuji Suzuki, T. Takada, Taro Takeshima, Michio Hayashi, Jun Miyashita, T. Azuma, Michiko Usui, Sugihiro Hamaguchi, S. Fukuma, K. Maehara, S. Fukuhara
{"title":"Usefulness of a mobile phone application for respiratory rate measurement in adult patients.","authors":"Ryuji Suzuki, T. Takada, Taro Takeshima, Michio Hayashi, Jun Miyashita, T. Azuma, Michiko Usui, Sugihiro Hamaguchi, S. Fukuma, K. Maehara, S. Fukuhara","doi":"10.1111/jjns.12481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIMS\nRespiratory rate measurement is one of the core nursing skills for early detection of deterioration of a patient's condition. Nevertheless, it is sometimes bothersome to visually measure respiratory rate over 1 min. Respiratory rate measurement using a mobile phone application \"RRate\" has been reported to be accurate and completed in a short time. However, it has only been investigated in children. The aim of this study was to validate the \"RRate\" compared with the 1-min method in adult patients.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThis was a cross-sectional study in the setting of a nursing school. Videos of the movement of the thorax during respiration of adult patients were made. Nursing students watched these videos and measured respiratory rate with each method. Bland-Altman analysis was used to calculate bias and limits of agreement. The times taken for the measurements were compared using a t test.\n\n\nRESULTS\nA total of 59 nursing students participated. When compared to the reference measurement, the one measured using \"RRate\" and the one measured over 1 min showed a bias of 0.40 breaths per minute and 0.65 breaths per minute, limits of agreement of -2.86 to 3.67 breaths per minute and -2.11 to 3.41 breaths per minute, respectively. The mean measurement time for \"RRate\" was 22.8 s (95% CI 13.9-36.6), which was significantly shorter than the 65.8 s (95% CI 61.0-73.2) for the measurement over 1 min (p < .001).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nRespiratory rate can be measured accurately in a shorter time using a mobile phone application in adult patients.","PeriodicalId":400159,"journal":{"name":"Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jjns.12481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
AIMS
Respiratory rate measurement is one of the core nursing skills for early detection of deterioration of a patient's condition. Nevertheless, it is sometimes bothersome to visually measure respiratory rate over 1 min. Respiratory rate measurement using a mobile phone application "RRate" has been reported to be accurate and completed in a short time. However, it has only been investigated in children. The aim of this study was to validate the "RRate" compared with the 1-min method in adult patients.
METHODS
This was a cross-sectional study in the setting of a nursing school. Videos of the movement of the thorax during respiration of adult patients were made. Nursing students watched these videos and measured respiratory rate with each method. Bland-Altman analysis was used to calculate bias and limits of agreement. The times taken for the measurements were compared using a t test.
RESULTS
A total of 59 nursing students participated. When compared to the reference measurement, the one measured using "RRate" and the one measured over 1 min showed a bias of 0.40 breaths per minute and 0.65 breaths per minute, limits of agreement of -2.86 to 3.67 breaths per minute and -2.11 to 3.41 breaths per minute, respectively. The mean measurement time for "RRate" was 22.8 s (95% CI 13.9-36.6), which was significantly shorter than the 65.8 s (95% CI 61.0-73.2) for the measurement over 1 min (p < .001).
CONCLUSIONS
Respiratory rate can be measured accurately in a shorter time using a mobile phone application in adult patients.
目的:呼吸频率测量是早期发现患者病情恶化的核心护理技能之一。然而,有时目测呼吸频率超过1分钟是很麻烦的。据报道,使用手机应用程序“RRate”测量呼吸频率是准确的,并在短时间内完成。然而,它只在儿童中进行了调查。本研究的目的是验证成人患者的“RRate”与1分钟方法的比较。方法本研究是在护理学校进行的横断面研究。制作成人患者呼吸时胸腔运动的录像。护理专业的学生观看这些视频,并用每种方法测量呼吸频率。Bland-Altman分析用于计算偏差和一致限度。测量所用的时间使用t检验进行比较。结果共59名护生参与调查。与参考测量结果相比,使用“RRate”测量的结果和超过1分钟测量的结果显示偏差为0.40次/分钟和0.65次/分钟,一致性极限分别为-2.86至3.67次/分钟和-2.11至3.41次/分钟。“RRate”的平均测量时间为22.8 s (95% CI 13.9 ~ 36.6),显著短于1 min以上测量的65.8 s (95% CI 61.0 ~ 73.2) (p < 0.001)。结论使用手机应用程序可在较短时间内准确测量成人患者的呼吸频率。