A summary of spectrum engineering, the why and how

E. Mokole, L. Cohen
{"title":"A summary of spectrum engineering, the why and how","authors":"E. Mokole, L. Cohen","doi":"10.1109/USNC-URSI-NRSM.2013.6525038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For many years, Electromagnetic Spectrum has been treated as a commodity within the United States, with allocation shared between Government and private sector interests. Government spectrum managers, working with their industry counterparts, carved out slices of spectrum under the governance of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) for commercial and government use, respectively. This relationship worked very well for many years due to the fact that electronic systems utilizing the spectrum, such as radar and satellite communications systems, were in designated bands. The solid-state revolution began to take hold aggressively in the early 1990s with an explosion of chip sets capable of performing the necessary functionality needed to support both the RF and signal processing infrastructures required for realizable high-speed wireless cellular communications. As the spectrum from UHF up through C band began to encounter greater congestion as a result of the influx of communications systems, the ability to manage a solution became rather tenuous at best. Since 2007 the US Navy has come to realize that in order to use spectrum, better engineering solutions are required to augment traditional spectrum management. These engineering solutions take the form of: (1) power amplifiers for radar and communications with lower levels of out-of-band emissions; (2) a waveform diversity approach for radar and communications that allow the requisite performance, but without adding to the out-of-band emissions; (3) antennas which support space-time diversity, thus allowing spectral compatibility in designated geographical zones; (4) adaptive software-defined receivers; and (5) bi-static/multi-static sensors, such as radars, that utilize the emissions of other users of the spectrum to support their operation.","PeriodicalId":123571,"journal":{"name":"2013 US National Committee of URSI National Radio Science Meeting (USNC-URSI NRSM)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 US National Committee of URSI National Radio Science Meeting (USNC-URSI NRSM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/USNC-URSI-NRSM.2013.6525038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

For many years, Electromagnetic Spectrum has been treated as a commodity within the United States, with allocation shared between Government and private sector interests. Government spectrum managers, working with their industry counterparts, carved out slices of spectrum under the governance of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) for commercial and government use, respectively. This relationship worked very well for many years due to the fact that electronic systems utilizing the spectrum, such as radar and satellite communications systems, were in designated bands. The solid-state revolution began to take hold aggressively in the early 1990s with an explosion of chip sets capable of performing the necessary functionality needed to support both the RF and signal processing infrastructures required for realizable high-speed wireless cellular communications. As the spectrum from UHF up through C band began to encounter greater congestion as a result of the influx of communications systems, the ability to manage a solution became rather tenuous at best. Since 2007 the US Navy has come to realize that in order to use spectrum, better engineering solutions are required to augment traditional spectrum management. These engineering solutions take the form of: (1) power amplifiers for radar and communications with lower levels of out-of-band emissions; (2) a waveform diversity approach for radar and communications that allow the requisite performance, but without adding to the out-of-band emissions; (3) antennas which support space-time diversity, thus allowing spectral compatibility in designated geographical zones; (4) adaptive software-defined receivers; and (5) bi-static/multi-static sensors, such as radars, that utilize the emissions of other users of the spectrum to support their operation.
摘要频谱工程,为什么和如何
多年来,电磁频谱在美国一直被视为一种商品,由政府和私营部门共同分配。在联邦通信委员会(FCC)和国家电信和信息管理局(NTIA)的管理下,政府频谱管理者与行业同行合作,分别划分出用于商业和政府使用的频谱片段。由于利用频谱的电子系统,如雷达和卫星通信系统,都在指定的频带中,因此这种关系多年来一直运作良好。固态革命在20世纪90年代初开始蓬勃发展,芯片组的爆炸式增长能够执行必要的功能,以支持实现高速无线蜂窝通信所需的RF和信号处理基础设施。由于通信系统的涌入,从UHF到C波段的频谱开始遇到更大的拥塞,管理解决方案的能力变得相当脆弱。自2007年以来,美国海军已经意识到,为了使用频谱,需要更好的工程解决方案来增强传统的频谱管理。这些工程解决方案采用以下形式:(1)用于雷达和通信的功率放大器,具有较低的带外发射水平;(2)用于雷达和通信的波形分集方法,该方法允许必要的性能,但不会增加带外发射;(3)支持时空分集的天线,从而在指定的地理区域内实现频谱兼容;(4)自适应软件定义接收机;(5)双静态/多静态传感器,如雷达,利用频谱其他用户的发射来支持其操作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信