Satellite Dishes, a Creative Incubator, and the Displacement of Aesthetics in Amsterdam

D. Wesselman
{"title":"Satellite Dishes, a Creative Incubator, and the Displacement of Aesthetics in Amsterdam","authors":"D. Wesselman","doi":"10.5117/9789463722032_CH09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines an aesthetic clash in the neighbourhood of Bos en\n Lommer in Amsterdam. One side of the street features decorated satellite\n dishes attached to social housing, which constitutes a battleground\n for otherness. Such dishes are broadly opposed in Dutch public and\n institutional discourse for being “ugly,” which amounts to xenophobia\n expressed in aesthetic terms. Opposite is a disused school building recently\n converted to an art-space-cum-hostel called WOW Amsterdam, a “creative\n incubator” that injects aesthetic difference and thereby the politics\n of gentrification into the area through foregrounding art, fashion and\n consumption. I argue that this clash shows how aesthetics are politics,\n and that the newly-inserted global gentrification aesthetic – following\n the creative incubator formula – displaces the aesthetics, and politics, of\n the battle for otherness across the street.","PeriodicalId":199048,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetics of Gentrification","volume":"325 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetics of Gentrification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/9789463722032_CH09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter examines an aesthetic clash in the neighbourhood of Bos en Lommer in Amsterdam. One side of the street features decorated satellite dishes attached to social housing, which constitutes a battleground for otherness. Such dishes are broadly opposed in Dutch public and institutional discourse for being “ugly,” which amounts to xenophobia expressed in aesthetic terms. Opposite is a disused school building recently converted to an art-space-cum-hostel called WOW Amsterdam, a “creative incubator” that injects aesthetic difference and thereby the politics of gentrification into the area through foregrounding art, fashion and consumption. I argue that this clash shows how aesthetics are politics, and that the newly-inserted global gentrification aesthetic – following the creative incubator formula – displaces the aesthetics, and politics, of the battle for otherness across the street.
卫星天线,创意孵化器,以及阿姆斯特丹美学的置换
本章考察了阿姆斯特丹Bos en Lommer社区的审美冲突。街道的一侧是与社会住房相连的装饰卫星天线,这构成了一个差异性的战场。这些菜肴在荷兰的公众和机构话语中被广泛反对,因为它们“丑陋”,这相当于用美学术语表达的仇外心理。对面是一座废弃的学校建筑,最近被改造成一个名为WOW Amsterdam的艺术空间兼旅馆,这是一个“创意孵化器”,通过突出艺术、时尚和消费,将审美差异注入该地区,从而将中产阶级化的政治注入该地区。我认为,这种冲突显示了美学是如何成为政治的,而新插入的全球中产阶级化美学——遵循创造性孵化器公式——取代了街对面为他者而战的美学和政治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信