Accessibility of international housing authorities for engaging in housing research

A. Terblanche, C. Cloete
{"title":"Accessibility of international housing authorities for engaging in housing research","authors":"A. Terblanche, C. Cloete","doi":"10.24052/bmr/v14nu01/art-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study attempted to ascertain what is regarded by international housing authorities as ‘adequate housing’ in their respective regions. Methodology: Non-probability sampling was undertaken to identify 199 countries and an attempt was made to engage in conversation regarding housing in their regions. Findings: It was found that a quarter of potential contacts were uncontactable. The majority (67,9%) could be contacted through their official contact channels, but were unresponsive, undelivered, or simply acknowledged via automation with no further interaction. Only 7,1% of potential contacts engaged in any interaction following from the attempted contact. Practical implications: International agreement on what is to be regarded as ‘adequate housing’ will not be reached while most housing authorities are not open to communication.","PeriodicalId":323589,"journal":{"name":"The Business and Management Review","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Business and Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24052/bmr/v14nu01/art-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study attempted to ascertain what is regarded by international housing authorities as ‘adequate housing’ in their respective regions. Methodology: Non-probability sampling was undertaken to identify 199 countries and an attempt was made to engage in conversation regarding housing in their regions. Findings: It was found that a quarter of potential contacts were uncontactable. The majority (67,9%) could be contacted through their official contact channels, but were unresponsive, undelivered, or simply acknowledged via automation with no further interaction. Only 7,1% of potential contacts engaged in any interaction following from the attempted contact. Practical implications: International agreement on what is to be regarded as ‘adequate housing’ will not be reached while most housing authorities are not open to communication.
国际住房当局参与住房研究的便利程度
目的:本研究试图确定国际住房当局在其各自地区所认为的“适足住房”。方法:进行了非概率抽样,以确定199个国家,并试图就其区域的住房问题进行讨论。研究发现:四分之一的潜在接触者是不可接触的。大多数(67.9%)可以通过他们的官方联系渠道联系,但没有回应,没有交付,或者只是通过自动化确认,没有进一步的互动。只有7.1%的潜在接触者在尝试接触后进行任何互动。实际影响:由于大多数房屋管理当局不愿意进行沟通,因此无法就什么是“适当住房”达成国际协议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信