Le chômage involontaire de Keynes n’est-il que conjoncturel ? Un retour sur les débats autour de la formalisation du chômage keynésien

Nicolas Piluso, E. Héron, Édouard Cottin-Euziol
{"title":"Le chômage involontaire de Keynes n’est-il que conjoncturel ? Un retour sur les débats autour de la formalisation du chômage keynésien","authors":"Nicolas Piluso, E. Héron, Édouard Cottin-Euziol","doi":"10.4000/interventionseconomiques.19694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we set out to demonstrate that the idea commonly found in macroeconomics textbooks that Keynesian unemployment is simply cyclical, is fallacious. After highlighting the shortcomings of traditional interpretations that confine Keynesian unemployment to a short-run perspective, we show that several types of macroeconomic models exhibit involuntary unemployment equilibria over the long run. In particular, it will be shown that there are many cases where full employment may not be achieved despite price and wage flexibility","PeriodicalId":267483,"journal":{"name":"Interventions économiques","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventions économiques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/interventionseconomiques.19694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, we set out to demonstrate that the idea commonly found in macroeconomics textbooks that Keynesian unemployment is simply cyclical, is fallacious. After highlighting the shortcomings of traditional interpretations that confine Keynesian unemployment to a short-run perspective, we show that several types of macroeconomic models exhibit involuntary unemployment equilibria over the long run. In particular, it will be shown that there are many cases where full employment may not be achieved despite price and wage flexibility
凯恩斯的非自愿失业仅仅是周期性的吗?对凯恩斯主义失业正式化辩论的回顾
在这篇文章中,我们着手证明宏观经济学教科书中普遍存在的观点——凯恩斯失业只是周期性的——是错误的。在强调将凯恩斯失业限制在短期视角的传统解释的缺点之后,我们展示了几种类型的宏观经济模型在长期内表现出非自愿失业均衡。特别是,它将表明,在许多情况下,尽管价格和工资具有灵活性,但可能无法实现充分就业
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信