Pathologies of Open Data Platforms and Desired Transparency-Related Affordances for Future Platforms

A. Ojo, Lukasz Porwol, Mohammad Waqar, Edobor Osagie, Arkadiusz Stasiewicz, Fatemeh Ahmadi Zeleti, M. Hogan, O. Harney, P. Riordan
{"title":"Pathologies of Open Data Platforms and Desired Transparency-Related Affordances for Future Platforms","authors":"A. Ojo, Lukasz Porwol, Mohammad Waqar, Edobor Osagie, Arkadiusz Stasiewicz, Fatemeh Ahmadi Zeleti, M. Hogan, O. Harney, P. Riordan","doi":"10.1145/2912160.2912237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increasing volumes of datasets published on open data platforms have had little impact on the public use of open data and perceived transparency of respective governments. At the same time, the innovation potentials of these datasets are far from realized due to many factors including poor quality of datasets. While past studies have attempted to catalog barriers to open data exploitation and use; few studies have focused on the role of the available open data platforms in tackling this problem. In addressing this gap, this research work examines the problems (or pathologies) associated with the use of current generation of open data platforms and perspectives of stakeholders on desirable features and affordances. Results from our analysis of existing platforms and stakeholders' views show several limiting factors on available platforms. Findings also provide insights into three categories of platform affordances that could spur greater use of open data published on these platforms and enhanced transparency of respective governments.","PeriodicalId":270321,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 17th International Digital Government Research Conference on Digital Government Research","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 17th International Digital Government Research Conference on Digital Government Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2912160.2912237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The increasing volumes of datasets published on open data platforms have had little impact on the public use of open data and perceived transparency of respective governments. At the same time, the innovation potentials of these datasets are far from realized due to many factors including poor quality of datasets. While past studies have attempted to catalog barriers to open data exploitation and use; few studies have focused on the role of the available open data platforms in tackling this problem. In addressing this gap, this research work examines the problems (or pathologies) associated with the use of current generation of open data platforms and perspectives of stakeholders on desirable features and affordances. Results from our analysis of existing platforms and stakeholders' views show several limiting factors on available platforms. Findings also provide insights into three categories of platform affordances that could spur greater use of open data published on these platforms and enhanced transparency of respective governments.
开放数据平台的病态和未来平台所需的透明度相关功能
在开放数据平台上发布的数据集数量不断增加,但对开放数据的公众使用和各自政府的感知透明度几乎没有影响。同时,由于数据集质量差等诸多因素,这些数据集的创新潜力远未实现。虽然过去的研究试图对开放数据开发和使用的障碍进行分类;很少有研究关注现有开放数据平台在解决这一问题中的作用。为了解决这一差距,本研究工作考察了与使用当前一代开放数据平台相关的问题(或病态),以及利益相关者对理想功能和功能的看法。我们对现有平台和利益相关者观点的分析结果显示了可用平台的几个限制因素。调查结果还提供了三类平台支持的见解,这些平台支持可以刺激更多地使用在这些平台上发布的开放数据,并提高各自政府的透明度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信