Changing CHAP (Change after Psychotherapy) scales – emergence of a reflexive evaluation methodology for small Gestalt therapy practices

B. Tomljenović
{"title":"Changing CHAP (Change after Psychotherapy) scales – emergence of a reflexive evaluation methodology for small Gestalt therapy practices","authors":"B. Tomljenović","doi":"10.53667/dkbg2396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"Abstract: This paper presents the process of developing a reflexive evaluation methodology for small private Gestalt psychotherapy practices, based on Rolf Sandell’s CHAP (Change after Psychotherapy) model. Therapy outcomes for four clients were assessed with use of the CHAP model extended to introspection and interview analysis to ensure a connection to Gestalt psychotherapy theoretical foundations of I-Thou relationship, dialogue and phenomenology. The learning process was supported by a third-party reviewer (supervisor). The sample included two clients who finished therapy years prior to assessment, one client who finished therapy months prior to assessment, and one client who had quit therapy unexpectedly years prior to assessment. Given the relatively satisfactory reliability of the tool irrespective of significant study limitations, it can be highly recommended to all Gestalt therapists. To assess outcomes of Gestalt therapy (GT) techniques and approach in general, a higher level of attention should be paid to sampling and raters’ training, regular application of the Gestalt Therapy Fidelity Scale1 and modification of the ‘Basic conflict’ aspect to fit the GT theoretical framework. Ratings and interview analysis of the client who quit therapy after eleven sessions indicate that application of GT techniques may have a strong, long-lasting impact, even in ‘brief interventions’, which calls for further research. Keywords: psychotherapy, outcome, evaluation, reflexive methodology, CHAP, rating.\"","PeriodicalId":103162,"journal":{"name":"British Gestalt Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Gestalt Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53667/dkbg2396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

"Abstract: This paper presents the process of developing a reflexive evaluation methodology for small private Gestalt psychotherapy practices, based on Rolf Sandell’s CHAP (Change after Psychotherapy) model. Therapy outcomes for four clients were assessed with use of the CHAP model extended to introspection and interview analysis to ensure a connection to Gestalt psychotherapy theoretical foundations of I-Thou relationship, dialogue and phenomenology. The learning process was supported by a third-party reviewer (supervisor). The sample included two clients who finished therapy years prior to assessment, one client who finished therapy months prior to assessment, and one client who had quit therapy unexpectedly years prior to assessment. Given the relatively satisfactory reliability of the tool irrespective of significant study limitations, it can be highly recommended to all Gestalt therapists. To assess outcomes of Gestalt therapy (GT) techniques and approach in general, a higher level of attention should be paid to sampling and raters’ training, regular application of the Gestalt Therapy Fidelity Scale1 and modification of the ‘Basic conflict’ aspect to fit the GT theoretical framework. Ratings and interview analysis of the client who quit therapy after eleven sessions indicate that application of GT techniques may have a strong, long-lasting impact, even in ‘brief interventions’, which calls for further research. Keywords: psychotherapy, outcome, evaluation, reflexive methodology, CHAP, rating."
改变CHAP(心理治疗后的改变)量表-小型完形治疗实践的反身性评估方法的出现
摘要:本文以Rolf Sandell的CHAP (Change after psychotherapy)模型为基础,介绍了小型私人完形心理治疗实践的反身性评估方法。使用扩展到内省和访谈分析的CHAP模型评估了四个客户的治疗结果,以确保与格式塔心理治疗的I-Thou关系,对话和现象学的理论基础联系起来。学习过程由第三方审稿人(主管)支持。样本包括两名在评估前几年完成治疗的来访者,一名在评估前几个月完成治疗的来访者,以及一名在评估前几年意外退出治疗的来访者。考虑到该工具相对令人满意的可靠性,而不考虑重大的研究限制,它可以被强烈推荐给所有格式塔治疗师。为了总体上评估完形治疗(GT)技术和方法的效果,应该更加重视抽样和评分者的培训,定期应用完形治疗忠实度量表,修改“基本冲突”方面以适应GT理论框架。对11个疗程后退出治疗的来访者的评分和访谈分析表明,即使在“短暂干预”中,GT技术的应用也可能产生强大而持久的影响,这需要进一步的研究。关键词:心理治疗,结果,评价,反身性方法论,CHAP,评分
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信