Comparison of arterial blood gas results obtained using two types of Heparinized Syringes

A. Mahmood
{"title":"Comparison of arterial blood gas results obtained using two types of Heparinized Syringes","authors":"A. Mahmood","doi":"10.55282/imj.oa1379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the arterial blood gas results obtained using syringes heparinized with liquid heparin and syringes containing lyophilized balanced heparin. Study Design: Comparative cross sectional. Place and Duration: This study was conducted in the Chemical Pathology department at Combined Military Hospital, Lahore for a period of six months from November 2022 to March 2023. Methodology: A total of 100 arterial blood samples were taken from 50 patients admitted in ICU using a regular plastic syringe flushed with 5000 IU/ mL liquid heparin and another containing lyophilized heparin. Samples were analyzed immediately after collection on Roche Cobas b121 ABG analyzer. Three of the measured parameters (pH, pCO2 and pO2) were then compared among both syringe groups. pH, pO2 and pCO2 were compared using mean difference. Results: The difference of means for pH was insignificant (p- Value >0.05). But pCO2 and pO2 showed significant difference in means with p- Values <0.05 (0.007 and 0.037, respectively). Bland Altman plots were also plotted for all three parameters. 12% of the pH values, 8% pco2 and 6% pO2 values exceeded the total allowable error. Conclusion: Arterial blood pH was comparable between the two types of syringes used. The pCO2 and pO2 differed significantly and where found to be lower in blood samples collected in the liquid heparin syringes. Keywords: Liquid Heparin, Lyophilized Heparin, Arterial Blood Gas, pH, pO2, pCO2. How to Cite This: Mahmood A, Sattar A, Shaheen S, Ahmad S, Hafeez A. Comparison of arterial blood gas results obtained using two types of Heparinized Syringes. Isra Med J. 2022; 14(4): 161-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55282/imj.oa1379","PeriodicalId":253275,"journal":{"name":"Isra Medical Journal","volume":"106 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Isra Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55282/imj.oa1379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the arterial blood gas results obtained using syringes heparinized with liquid heparin and syringes containing lyophilized balanced heparin. Study Design: Comparative cross sectional. Place and Duration: This study was conducted in the Chemical Pathology department at Combined Military Hospital, Lahore for a period of six months from November 2022 to March 2023. Methodology: A total of 100 arterial blood samples were taken from 50 patients admitted in ICU using a regular plastic syringe flushed with 5000 IU/ mL liquid heparin and another containing lyophilized heparin. Samples were analyzed immediately after collection on Roche Cobas b121 ABG analyzer. Three of the measured parameters (pH, pCO2 and pO2) were then compared among both syringe groups. pH, pO2 and pCO2 were compared using mean difference. Results: The difference of means for pH was insignificant (p- Value >0.05). But pCO2 and pO2 showed significant difference in means with p- Values <0.05 (0.007 and 0.037, respectively). Bland Altman plots were also plotted for all three parameters. 12% of the pH values, 8% pco2 and 6% pO2 values exceeded the total allowable error. Conclusion: Arterial blood pH was comparable between the two types of syringes used. The pCO2 and pO2 differed significantly and where found to be lower in blood samples collected in the liquid heparin syringes. Keywords: Liquid Heparin, Lyophilized Heparin, Arterial Blood Gas, pH, pO2, pCO2. How to Cite This: Mahmood A, Sattar A, Shaheen S, Ahmad S, Hafeez A. Comparison of arterial blood gas results obtained using two types of Heparinized Syringes. Isra Med J. 2022; 14(4): 161-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55282/imj.oa1379
两种肝素化注射器动脉血气结果的比较
目的:本研究的目的是比较用液体肝素肝素化注射器和含有冻干平衡肝素的注射器获得的动脉血气结果。研究设计:比较横断面。地点和时间:本研究于2022年11月至2023年3月在拉合尔联合军事医院化学病理科进行,为期6个月。方法:采用常规塑料注射器分别用5000 IU/ mL液体肝素和冻干肝素冲洗50例ICU住院患者,共采集100例动脉血。样品采集后立即在罗氏Cobas b121 ABG分析仪上进行分析。然后比较两个注射组的三个测量参数(pH, pCO2和pO2)。pH、pO2、pCO2采用均差法比较。结果:pH平均值差异无统计学意义(p值>0.05)。但pCO2和pO2均值差异显著,p值分别<0.05(0.007和0.037)。还绘制了所有三个参数的Bland Altman图。12%的pH值、8%的pco2值和6%的pO2值超出了总允许误差。结论:两种注射器的动脉血pH值具有可比性。在液体肝素注射器中收集的血液样本中,二氧化碳分压和二氧化碳分压差异显著,并且发现其较低。关键词:液态肝素,冻干肝素,动脉血气,pH, pO2, pCO2Mahmood A, Sattar A, Shaheen S, Ahmad S, Hafeez A.使用两种肝素化注射器获得的动脉血气结果的比较。以色列医学J. 2022;14(4): 161 - 164。DOI: https://doi.org/10.55282/imj.oa1379
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信