{"title":"Requirements trade-offs during UML design","authors":"A. Andrews, P. Runeson, R. France","doi":"10.1109/ECBS.2004.1316710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Designs almost always require trade-offs between competing design choices to meet pervasive system dependability requirements (e.g., security, performance and fault tolerance system goals). In some cases, dependability requirements are realized by functionality that cross-cuts designs. Aspect-oriented modeling (AOM) methods allow developers to localize such cross-cutting functionality in design modeling views called aspects. Aspects can be composed with other design views to obtain an integrated view of a design. This paper presents a technique that extends such methods to cover dependability requirements that are not directly realized by functional structures in a design. Performance goals provide examples of such requirements. We also present a trade-off mechanism to rank feasible solutions with respect to requirements priorities between different dependability requirements. The paper applies this technique to an example that has performance, fault-tolerance, and security requirements.","PeriodicalId":137219,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems, 2004.","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems, 2004.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECBS.2004.1316710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Designs almost always require trade-offs between competing design choices to meet pervasive system dependability requirements (e.g., security, performance and fault tolerance system goals). In some cases, dependability requirements are realized by functionality that cross-cuts designs. Aspect-oriented modeling (AOM) methods allow developers to localize such cross-cutting functionality in design modeling views called aspects. Aspects can be composed with other design views to obtain an integrated view of a design. This paper presents a technique that extends such methods to cover dependability requirements that are not directly realized by functional structures in a design. Performance goals provide examples of such requirements. We also present a trade-off mechanism to rank feasible solutions with respect to requirements priorities between different dependability requirements. The paper applies this technique to an example that has performance, fault-tolerance, and security requirements.