Vanessa Gunnella, Laura Lebastard, Paloma López-García, Roberta Serafini, Alessandro Zona Mattioli
{"title":"The Impact of the Euro on Trade: Two Decades into Monetary Union","authors":"Vanessa Gunnella, Laura Lebastard, Paloma López-García, Roberta Serafini, Alessandro Zona Mattioli","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3941630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The consensus back in 2008 – ten years after the introduction of the euro – was that the adoption of a common currency had made a limited impact of around 2% in total on the trade flows of the first wave of euro area countries (Baldwin et al., 2008). Since then, six more countries have joined the euro area, and firms have internationalised their production processes. These two phenomena are interrelated and may have changed the way the common currency affects the euro area economy. Therefore, with the common currency now into its third decade – and with more countries queuing to adopt it – this paper revisits the trade effects of the euro, focusing on the newer euro adopters (i.e. those countries that have adopted the euro since 2007) and their interaction with the first wave of euro area members via supply chains. The contribution of the paper is twofold. First, it revisits the estimated aggregate impact of the euro on euro area trade, as well as on trade within and between the two waves of adopters. Data on bilateral flows between 1990 and 2015 for an extended sample of countries to estimate a gravity equation indicate a significant trade impact, ranging between 4.3% and 6.3% in total on average, with the magnitude being the highest for exports from the second wave of adopters to the first wave of adopters. If a synthetic control approach (Abadie and Gardeazabal, 2003; Abadie et al., 2010) is used instead, the estimated gains associated with euro adoption are greater. In particular, exports of both intermediate and final products from countries belonging to the first wave of euro adopters to those belonging to the second wave are estimated to have increased by about 30% using this approach. The second contribution made by this paper relates to the channels through which trade might be affected by a currency union. This question is explored by looking separately at trade in intermediate goods and final products. While we find that trade gains were mainly driven by trade in intermediate goods among countries that adopted the currency earlier (5.3%), our results also show that the euro had a positive effect on the exports of final products from the second wave of adopters to other euro area countries. This effect is as high as 10.6% with the gravity model and 32% with the synthetic control approach. One of the reasons for the difference in the range of estimates between the two approaches might be that the gravity model can control for unobserved characteristics via fixed effects, while the synthetic control approach may fail to do so. These results suggest that the euro facilitated the establishment and expansion of international production chains in Europe. In turn, this is likely to have increased business cycle synchronisation in the euro area and to have supported market access for later adopters. JEL Classification: F14, F15","PeriodicalId":146720,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Monetary Union (Topic)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Monetary Union (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3941630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
The consensus back in 2008 – ten years after the introduction of the euro – was that the adoption of a common currency had made a limited impact of around 2% in total on the trade flows of the first wave of euro area countries (Baldwin et al., 2008). Since then, six more countries have joined the euro area, and firms have internationalised their production processes. These two phenomena are interrelated and may have changed the way the common currency affects the euro area economy. Therefore, with the common currency now into its third decade – and with more countries queuing to adopt it – this paper revisits the trade effects of the euro, focusing on the newer euro adopters (i.e. those countries that have adopted the euro since 2007) and their interaction with the first wave of euro area members via supply chains. The contribution of the paper is twofold. First, it revisits the estimated aggregate impact of the euro on euro area trade, as well as on trade within and between the two waves of adopters. Data on bilateral flows between 1990 and 2015 for an extended sample of countries to estimate a gravity equation indicate a significant trade impact, ranging between 4.3% and 6.3% in total on average, with the magnitude being the highest for exports from the second wave of adopters to the first wave of adopters. If a synthetic control approach (Abadie and Gardeazabal, 2003; Abadie et al., 2010) is used instead, the estimated gains associated with euro adoption are greater. In particular, exports of both intermediate and final products from countries belonging to the first wave of euro adopters to those belonging to the second wave are estimated to have increased by about 30% using this approach. The second contribution made by this paper relates to the channels through which trade might be affected by a currency union. This question is explored by looking separately at trade in intermediate goods and final products. While we find that trade gains were mainly driven by trade in intermediate goods among countries that adopted the currency earlier (5.3%), our results also show that the euro had a positive effect on the exports of final products from the second wave of adopters to other euro area countries. This effect is as high as 10.6% with the gravity model and 32% with the synthetic control approach. One of the reasons for the difference in the range of estimates between the two approaches might be that the gravity model can control for unobserved characteristics via fixed effects, while the synthetic control approach may fail to do so. These results suggest that the euro facilitated the establishment and expansion of international production chains in Europe. In turn, this is likely to have increased business cycle synchronisation in the euro area and to have supported market access for later adopters. JEL Classification: F14, F15
早在2008年,也就是欧元引入十年后,人们就达成了共识,认为采用共同货币对第一波欧元区国家的贸易流量产生了有限的影响,总共约为2% (Baldwin et al., 2008)。从那时起,又有6个国家加入了欧元区,企业的生产流程也国际化了。这两种现象是相互关联的,可能已经改变了共同货币影响欧元区经济的方式。因此,随着共同货币进入第三个十年,以及越来越多的国家排队等待采用欧元,本文重新审视欧元的贸易影响,重点关注欧元的新采用者(即自2007年以来采用欧元的国家)以及它们通过供应链与第一波欧元区成员国的互动。这篇论文的贡献是双重的。首先,它重新审视了欧元对欧元区贸易的总体影响,以及对两波采用欧元国家内部和之间贸易的影响。为估计重力方程而扩大的国家样本的1990年至2015年双边流动数据表明,贸易影响显著,平均在4.3%至6.3%之间,从第二波采用者到第一波采用者的出口幅度最大。如果采用综合控制方法(Abadie and Gardeazabal, 2003;使用Abadie et al., 2010),则与采用欧元相关的估计收益更大。特别是,使用这种方法,从第一波采用欧元的国家到第二波采用欧元的国家的中间产品和最终产品的出口估计增加了约30%。本文的第二个贡献与货币联盟可能影响贸易的渠道有关。这个问题是通过分别考察中间产品和最终产品的贸易来探讨的。虽然我们发现贸易收益主要是由较早采用欧元的国家(5.3%)之间的中间产品贸易推动的,但我们的结果也表明,欧元对第二波采用欧元的国家向其他欧元区国家出口最终产品有积极影响。重力模型的效果高达10.6%,综合控制方法的效果高达32%。两种方法估计范围不同的原因之一可能是重力模型可以通过固定效应控制未观察到的特征,而综合控制方法可能无法做到这一点。这些结果表明,欧元促进了欧洲国际生产链的建立和扩大。反过来,这可能会增加欧元区商业周期的同步性,并支持后来的采用者进入市场。JEL分类:F14, F15