Veränderungsmessung mit der Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS): Änderungssensitivität und Änderungsreliabilität

A. Hinz1, Uta Zweynert2, Jörg Kittel3, Wilmar Igl4, Reinhold Schwarz †5
{"title":"Veränderungsmessung mit der Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS): Änderungssensitivität und Änderungsreliabilität","authors":"A. Hinz1, Uta Zweynert2, Jörg Kittel3, Wilmar Igl4, Reinhold Schwarz †5","doi":"10.1055/s-2008-1067578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"! Responsiveness or sensitivity to change of a questionnaire is an important criterion in the as− sessment of the effect of a medical intervention. In the literature there are several criteria for re− sponsiveness, based on changes in the popula− tion mean. Here we present an alternative ap− proach for the measurement of change (change reliability), applying the criteria of internal con− sistency to change scores. Using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale HADS, these ap− proaches are demonstrated and compared for 2 subject samples, comprising 901 oncologic pa− tients and 2695 cardiac patients. The effect size d is well suited to assess the effect of an interven− tion, based on changes of the sample mean. The analyses of the 2 samples yielded effect sizes of about 0.25. The newly created change reliability yielded coefficients of about .70 which indicate the reliability of the individual changes in anxie− ty and depression.","PeriodicalId":345802,"journal":{"name":"Psychother Psych Med","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychother Psych Med","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1067578","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

! Responsiveness or sensitivity to change of a questionnaire is an important criterion in the as− sessment of the effect of a medical intervention. In the literature there are several criteria for re− sponsiveness, based on changes in the popula− tion mean. Here we present an alternative ap− proach for the measurement of change (change reliability), applying the criteria of internal con− sistency to change scores. Using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale HADS, these ap− proaches are demonstrated and compared for 2 subject samples, comprising 901 oncologic pa− tients and 2695 cardiac patients. The effect size d is well suited to assess the effect of an interven− tion, based on changes of the sample mean. The analyses of the 2 samples yielded effect sizes of about 0.25. The newly created change reliability yielded coefficients of about .70 which indicate the reliability of the individual changes in anxie− ty and depression.
与医院癌细胞和抑郁程度的变化:改变前和变化能力
! 对问卷变化的反应性或敏感性是评估医疗干预效果的一个重要标准。在文献中,根据人口平均值的变化,有几种反应性标准。在这里,我们提出了一种替代方法来测量变化(变化可靠性),将内部一致性的标准应用于变化分数。使用医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS),这些方法在包括901名肿瘤患者和2695名心脏病患者的2个受试者样本中得到验证和比较。基于样本均值的变化,效应大小d非常适合于评估干预的效果。对这两个样本的分析得出的效应值约为0.25。新建立的变化信度系数约为0.70,表明焦虑和抑郁的个体变化的信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信