Modification of the Mechanism of Knowledge Transfer to the Economy in Conditions of Turbulence

A. Nikonova
{"title":"Modification of the Mechanism of Knowledge Transfer to the Economy in Conditions of Turbulence","authors":"A. Nikonova","doi":"10.22394/2410-132x-2023-9-1-21-35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper deals with the problem of a huge gap between the knowledge creation and the knowledge impact on the economy, which is relevant for Russia. A possible solution can be found by improving the tools to support the commercialization of research results and the growth of R&D-intensive companies. A set of such tools is seen as a favorable mechanism to turn knowledge into innovation. The main idea of the article, based on a system approach, puts the adoption of strategic decisions before the improvement of the innovation mechanism. As shown in the article, the strategy of scientific and technological development precedes the scenario to develop research and innovation. Guided by the scenario, you can select the appropriate tools to support certain sciences and innovations, since such a choice depends entirely on the strategic goals, scenario, and innovation potential. These provisions are substantiated in the article in relation to Russia. Two types of strategic goals are discussed, and two scenarios of respective types are compared with each other to show the big difference between leaping forward through radical innovation and moving forward through incremental innovation. The key requirements for both types of innovation mechanisms are formulated in the context of the geopolitical and economic crisis. Turbulence brings the economic system to a bifurcation point, which makes innovation governance more responsible in making decisions, so the proposed provisions can be useful in developing appropriate regulatory tools.","PeriodicalId":411993,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Science","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132x-2023-9-1-21-35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper deals with the problem of a huge gap between the knowledge creation and the knowledge impact on the economy, which is relevant for Russia. A possible solution can be found by improving the tools to support the commercialization of research results and the growth of R&D-intensive companies. A set of such tools is seen as a favorable mechanism to turn knowledge into innovation. The main idea of the article, based on a system approach, puts the adoption of strategic decisions before the improvement of the innovation mechanism. As shown in the article, the strategy of scientific and technological development precedes the scenario to develop research and innovation. Guided by the scenario, you can select the appropriate tools to support certain sciences and innovations, since such a choice depends entirely on the strategic goals, scenario, and innovation potential. These provisions are substantiated in the article in relation to Russia. Two types of strategic goals are discussed, and two scenarios of respective types are compared with each other to show the big difference between leaping forward through radical innovation and moving forward through incremental innovation. The key requirements for both types of innovation mechanisms are formulated in the context of the geopolitical and economic crisis. Turbulence brings the economic system to a bifurcation point, which makes innovation governance more responsible in making decisions, so the proposed provisions can be useful in developing appropriate regulatory tools.
动荡条件下知识向经济转移机制的修正
本文研究了知识创造与知识对经济的影响之间存在巨大差距的问题,这与俄罗斯有关。可以通过改进工具来支持研究成果的商业化和研发密集型公司的成长来找到一个可能的解决方案。一套这样的工具被视为将知识转化为创新的有利机制。本文的主要思想是基于系统方法,将战略决策置于创新机制的完善之上。如文章所示,科技发展战略先于发展研究和创新的情景。在场景的指导下,您可以选择合适的工具来支持特定的科学和创新,因为这样的选择完全取决于战略目标、场景和创新潜力。这些规定在关于俄罗斯的条款中得到证实。本文讨论了两类战略目标,并对各自类型的两种情景进行了对比,显示了通过突破性创新实现跨越式发展与通过渐进式创新实现跨越式发展的巨大差异。这两种创新机制的关键要求都是在地缘政治和经济危机的背景下制定的。动荡将经济体系带到一个分岔点,这使得创新治理在决策时更负责任,因此拟议的规定可能有助于制定适当的监管工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信