A Comparative Study between Wild and Cultivated Varieties of Adlay Grains for Some Engineering Properties

R. Andriansyah, D. Hidayat, S. Kuala, R. Luthfiyanti, D. Surahman, A. Indriati
{"title":"A Comparative Study between Wild and Cultivated Varieties of Adlay Grains for Some Engineering Properties","authors":"R. Andriansyah, D. Hidayat, S. Kuala, R. Luthfiyanti, D. Surahman, A. Indriati","doi":"10.5220/0010001001040113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This study was carried out to complement the database of wild and cultivated Adlay grain varieties and to identify the similarities and differences between them. Results of the analyses determined that regarding the polar diameter (D p ), thickness (T), and coefficient of contact surface (C cs ), there were not any significant differences between wild and cultivated varieties (p>0.05); Otherwise there were significant differences on the properties of equatorial diameter (D e ), geometric mean diameter (D gm ), arithmetic mean diameter (D am ), frontal surface area (A fs ), transverse area A t ), sphericity (ø), shape index I s ), mass (M), volume (V), particle density (ρ p ), bulk density (ρ b ), and porosity (ε ) (p<0.05). In term of shape, the wild variety tended to be widened, while the cultivated variety tended to be lengthwise. Based on hardness and stickiness, the wild type was harder and stickier than the cultivated ones. The emptying angle of repose, filling angle of repose and the static friction of cultivated variety was relatively higher than that of the wild type. The mean total colour difference between the wild and cultivated variety was 6.952 ± 0.011.","PeriodicalId":412618,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 16th ASEAN Food Conference","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 16th ASEAN Food Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5220/0010001001040113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: This study was carried out to complement the database of wild and cultivated Adlay grain varieties and to identify the similarities and differences between them. Results of the analyses determined that regarding the polar diameter (D p ), thickness (T), and coefficient of contact surface (C cs ), there were not any significant differences between wild and cultivated varieties (p>0.05); Otherwise there were significant differences on the properties of equatorial diameter (D e ), geometric mean diameter (D gm ), arithmetic mean diameter (D am ), frontal surface area (A fs ), transverse area A t ), sphericity (ø), shape index I s ), mass (M), volume (V), particle density (ρ p ), bulk density (ρ b ), and porosity (ε ) (p<0.05). In term of shape, the wild variety tended to be widened, while the cultivated variety tended to be lengthwise. Based on hardness and stickiness, the wild type was harder and stickier than the cultivated ones. The emptying angle of repose, filling angle of repose and the static friction of cultivated variety was relatively higher than that of the wild type. The mean total colour difference between the wild and cultivated variety was 6.952 ± 0.011.
野生与栽培杂粮品种工程性状的比较研究
本研究是为了补充野生和栽培阿德莱谷物品种数据库,并确定它们之间的异同。分析结果表明,野生品种与栽培品种在极径(dp)、厚度(T)和接触面系数(cs)上差异不显著(p>0.05);赤道直径(D e)、几何平均直径(D gm)、算术平均直径(D am)、正面表面积(A fs)、横向面积(A t)、球形度(ø)、形状指数(I s)、质量(M)、体积(V)、颗粒密度(ρ p)、容重(ρ b)、孔隙度(ε)等性状差异均有统计学意义(p<0.05)。从形态上看,野生品种呈加宽型,栽培品种呈纵向型。根据硬度和粘性,野生型比栽培型更硬、更粘。栽培品种的排空休止角、充盈休止角和静摩擦系数均高于野生品种。野生品种与栽培品种的平均总色差为6.952±0.011。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信