META ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENCE OF INQUIRY LEARNING MODEL ON STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES IN PHYSICS AND JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL SUBJECTS

Vinika Humaira, W. S. Dewi
{"title":"META ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENCE OF INQUIRY LEARNING MODEL ON STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES IN PHYSICS AND JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL SUBJECTS","authors":"Vinika Humaira, W. S. Dewi","doi":"10.24036/12628171074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Education is an effective way to increase the quality of human resources; as a guide for implementing national education, curriculum is one of the most essential variables that can influence the learning process' performance. Graduate competency is one of the educational criteria, and it may be attained by employing the appropriate learning model in the teaching and learning process. One of the inquiry learning models is the most often utilized learning paradigm. The goal of this study is to determine the amount of the effect size of the inquiry model's influence on high school and junior high school physics results. A meta-analysis was used in this study.. Meta-analysis is a type of study that involves summarizing, examining, and analyzing data from a number of previous studies. Conducting a literature review, gathering data, examining, assessing, analyzing, and interpreting articles, and preparing report results are all stages of meta-analysis research. The statistical data must be included in the criteria for the articles used. There are two research findings that may be deduced from the data analysis results. First, as can be seen from the summary effect size values for high school 0.42 and junior high school 0.41, the influence of the inquiry learning model on learning outcomes is stronger at the high school level than at the junior high school level. The two summary effect sizes influence the inquiry learning model the most influence on the subject matter, namely the vibration and wave material of 0.73 and the lowest on the motion system material of 0.15.","PeriodicalId":176296,"journal":{"name":"PILLAR OF PHYSICS EDUCATION","volume":"1996 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PILLAR OF PHYSICS EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24036/12628171074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Education is an effective way to increase the quality of human resources; as a guide for implementing national education, curriculum is one of the most essential variables that can influence the learning process' performance. Graduate competency is one of the educational criteria, and it may be attained by employing the appropriate learning model in the teaching and learning process. One of the inquiry learning models is the most often utilized learning paradigm. The goal of this study is to determine the amount of the effect size of the inquiry model's influence on high school and junior high school physics results. A meta-analysis was used in this study.. Meta-analysis is a type of study that involves summarizing, examining, and analyzing data from a number of previous studies. Conducting a literature review, gathering data, examining, assessing, analyzing, and interpreting articles, and preparing report results are all stages of meta-analysis research. The statistical data must be included in the criteria for the articles used. There are two research findings that may be deduced from the data analysis results. First, as can be seen from the summary effect size values for high school 0.42 and junior high school 0.41, the influence of the inquiry learning model on learning outcomes is stronger at the high school level than at the junior high school level. The two summary effect sizes influence the inquiry learning model the most influence on the subject matter, namely the vibration and wave material of 0.73 and the lowest on the motion system material of 0.15.
探究性学习模式对学生物理和初中各科学习成果影响的Meta分析
教育是提高人力资源素质的有效途径;课程作为实施国民教育的指南,是影响学习过程绩效的最重要变量之一。研究生胜任力是教育的标准之一,在教学过程中采用合适的学习模式可以达到研究生胜任力的要求。研究性学习模式是最常用的学习范式之一。本研究的目的是确定探究模式对高中和初中物理成绩影响的效应大小。本研究采用荟萃分析。荟萃分析是一种研究类型,包括总结、检查和分析来自许多先前研究的数据。进行文献综述,收集数据,检查,评估,分析和解释文章,并准备报告结果是元分析研究的所有阶段。统计数据必须包含在所用物品的标准中。从数据分析结果可以推断出两个研究结果。首先,从高中0.42和初中0.41的综合效应大小值可以看出,探究学习模式对学习成果的影响在高中阶段强于初中阶段。两个总结效应量对探究学习模型的影响对主题的影响最大,即振动和波动材料的影响为0.73,对运动系统材料的影响最小,为0.15。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信