EU Law in International Arbitration: Referrals to the European Court of Justice

J. Basedow
{"title":"EU Law in International Arbitration: Referrals to the European Court of Justice","authors":"J. Basedow","doi":"10.54648/joia2015017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While the courts of Member States are enabled or even required to submit preliminary questions concerning the interpretation of EU law to the Court of Justice of the European Union such referrals have traditionally been held inadmissible where made by arbitration panels. The article highlights a gradual softening of the Court of Justice’s position on this matter which would allow arbitral tribunals in investment protection proceedings to address the Court of Justice already at present. It further outlines some fundamental changes in the overall environment of commercial arbitration which should lead to a reversal of the Court’s position also in this field.","PeriodicalId":194580,"journal":{"name":"Max Planck Institute for Comparative & International Private Law Research Paper Series","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Max Planck Institute for Comparative & International Private Law Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/joia2015017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

Abstract

While the courts of Member States are enabled or even required to submit preliminary questions concerning the interpretation of EU law to the Court of Justice of the European Union such referrals have traditionally been held inadmissible where made by arbitration panels. The article highlights a gradual softening of the Court of Justice’s position on this matter which would allow arbitral tribunals in investment protection proceedings to address the Court of Justice already at present. It further outlines some fundamental changes in the overall environment of commercial arbitration which should lead to a reversal of the Court’s position also in this field.
国际仲裁中的欧盟法:提交欧洲法院
虽然成员国的法院能够甚至被要求向欧盟法院提交有关欧盟法律解释的初步问题,但传统上,如果由仲裁小组提出,这种提交是不可受理的。该条强调了法院在这个问题上的立场逐渐软化,这将使投资保护程序中的仲裁法庭目前已经可以向法院申诉。它进一步概述了商事仲裁总环境中的一些根本变化,这些变化将导致法院在这一领域的立场也发生逆转。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信