Using program and user information to improve file prediction performance

Tsozen Yeh, D. Long, S. Brandt
{"title":"Using program and user information to improve file prediction performance","authors":"Tsozen Yeh, D. Long, S. Brandt","doi":"10.1109/ISPASS.2001.990685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Correct prediction of file accesses can improve system pe formance by mitigating the relative speed difference between CPU and disks. This paper discusses Program-based Last Successor (PLS) and presents Program- and Userbased Lust Successor (PULS), file prediction algorithms that utilize information about the program and user that access the jles. Our simulation results show that PLS makes 21% fewer incorrect predictions and PULS makes 24% fewer incorrect predictions than last-successor with roughly the same number of correct predictions that lastsuccessor makes. The cache space wasted on incorrectpredictions can be reduced accordingly. We also show that a cache using the Least Recently Used (LRU) caching algorithm can perform better when the PULS is applied. In some cases, a cache using LRU and either PLS or PULS performs better than a cache up to 40 times larger using LRU alone.","PeriodicalId":104148,"journal":{"name":"2001 IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software. ISPASS.","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2001 IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software. ISPASS.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPASS.2001.990685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Correct prediction of file accesses can improve system pe formance by mitigating the relative speed difference between CPU and disks. This paper discusses Program-based Last Successor (PLS) and presents Program- and Userbased Lust Successor (PULS), file prediction algorithms that utilize information about the program and user that access the jles. Our simulation results show that PLS makes 21% fewer incorrect predictions and PULS makes 24% fewer incorrect predictions than last-successor with roughly the same number of correct predictions that lastsuccessor makes. The cache space wasted on incorrectpredictions can be reduced accordingly. We also show that a cache using the Least Recently Used (LRU) caching algorithm can perform better when the PULS is applied. In some cases, a cache using LRU and either PLS or PULS performs better than a cache up to 40 times larger using LRU alone.
利用程序和用户信息提高文件预测性能
正确预测文件访问可以通过减小CPU和磁盘之间的相对速度差异来提高系统性能。本文讨论了基于程序的最后继承者(PLS),并介绍了基于程序和基于用户的最后继承者(PULS),利用访问文件的程序和用户信息的文件预测算法。我们的模拟结果表明,PLS比last-successor少做出21%的错误预测,而PULS比last-successor少做出24%的错误预测,其正确预测的数量与last-successor大致相同。在错误预测上浪费的缓存空间可以相应减少。我们还表明,当应用PULS时,使用最近最少使用(LRU)缓存算法的缓存可以执行得更好。在某些情况下,使用LRU和PLS或PULS的缓存比仅使用LRU的缓存大40倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信