TUDUHAN SELINGKUH : SANKSI DAN PEMBUKTIAN DALAM BINGKAI ADAT

Dody Sulistio, D. Lestari
{"title":"TUDUHAN SELINGKUH : SANKSI DAN PEMBUKTIAN DALAM BINGKAI ADAT","authors":"Dody Sulistio, D. Lestari","doi":"10.53363/bureau.v2i2.104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to find out the Legal Sanctions d for Perpetrators of Infidelity Allegations and their evidentiary mechanisms according to the Customary Law of Lubuk Ruso Village, Pemayung District, Batang Hari Jambi Regency. This research uses Descriptive Qualitative research with data collection methods carried out by observation, interviews and documentation. Based on the research that has been carried out, the following results and conclusions are obtained: Allegations of infidelity according to customary law are proven by the presence of witnesses and oaths in the trial. Customary institutions in enforcing the law on perpetrators of allegations of infidelity (slander) are based on the eight-year-old regulations in the dago-dagi article, namely all forms of acts that violate the common/public interest, causing domestic chaos. Such as mistakes against the government, making slander (provocations) and creating domestic chaos. The punishment was a full, double-folded wake, namely a buffalo, 800 bushels of rice, 800 coconuts, 8 sacks of white cloth and a bag of semanih. Meanwhile, according to the traditional head in the form of buffalo, rice, coconut, semanic selemak, asam segamo, eaten by many people. These sanctions/fines are first discussed by the customary apparatus, then the sanctions/fines imposed are in accordance with the results of the rembukan carried out by the customary apparatus. If the perpetrator cannot pay the sanction, then his heirs can help pay it, if no one can pay the claim then it can be sued in court","PeriodicalId":345865,"journal":{"name":"Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v2i2.104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to find out the Legal Sanctions d for Perpetrators of Infidelity Allegations and their evidentiary mechanisms according to the Customary Law of Lubuk Ruso Village, Pemayung District, Batang Hari Jambi Regency. This research uses Descriptive Qualitative research with data collection methods carried out by observation, interviews and documentation. Based on the research that has been carried out, the following results and conclusions are obtained: Allegations of infidelity according to customary law are proven by the presence of witnesses and oaths in the trial. Customary institutions in enforcing the law on perpetrators of allegations of infidelity (slander) are based on the eight-year-old regulations in the dago-dagi article, namely all forms of acts that violate the common/public interest, causing domestic chaos. Such as mistakes against the government, making slander (provocations) and creating domestic chaos. The punishment was a full, double-folded wake, namely a buffalo, 800 bushels of rice, 800 coconuts, 8 sacks of white cloth and a bag of semanih. Meanwhile, according to the traditional head in the form of buffalo, rice, coconut, semanic selemak, asam segamo, eaten by many people. These sanctions/fines are first discussed by the customary apparatus, then the sanctions/fines imposed are in accordance with the results of the rembukan carried out by the customary apparatus. If the perpetrator cannot pay the sanction, then his heirs can help pay it, if no one can pay the claim then it can be sued in court
作弊指控:海关框架内的制裁和证明
本文旨在根据巴唐哈里占比县佩马扬区Lubuk Ruso村习惯法,找出对出轨指控肇事者的法律制裁及其证据机制。本研究采用描述性定性研究,通过观察、访谈和文献资料收集数据。根据所进行的研究,得出了下列结果和结论:根据习惯法的不忠指控得到证人在场和审判中宣誓的证明。对犯有不忠(诽谤)指控的行为人执行法律的习惯机构是基于八年前的“打闹”条款的规定,即所有形式的违反共同/公共利益,造成家庭混乱的行为。例如对政府的错误,诽谤(挑衅)和制造国内混乱。惩罚是一个完整的,折叠的尾流,即一头水牛,800蒲式耳大米,800个椰子,8袋白布和一袋麻袋。同时,根据传统的头部形式,水牛、大米、椰子、语义selemak、asam segamo,被许多人食用。这些制裁/罚款首先由习惯机构讨论,然后根据习惯机构进行的审查结果实施制裁/罚款。如果行为人不能支付罚款,那么他的继承人可以帮助支付,如果没有人可以支付索赔,那么可以在法庭上起诉
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信