Strategies for Dealing with Low Test Uncertainty Ratios

Dennis Jackson
{"title":"Strategies for Dealing with Low Test Uncertainty Ratios","authors":"Dennis Jackson","doi":"10.51843/wsproceedings.2017.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The accuracy of a calibration or testing scenario is often measured using the Test Uncertainty Ratio (TUR) which is the ratio of the specification to be tested to the calibration process uncertainty. As a result of improvements in the state of the art in Test, Measurement, and Diagnostic Equipment (TMDE), it is often difficult to meet TUR requirements. When a TUR requirement can't be met, what then? As a result of the transition to the use of the Probability of False Acceptance (PFA) as a primary metric for calibration testing, there are many appropriate strategies for dealing with this situation. A common approach is to simply apply a guard band to the test tolerances. However, it has been found that this is not always appropriate. In fact, there is a fairly narrow set of situations in which guard bands should be employed. This paper discusses alternatives that should be considered in addition to guard bands.","PeriodicalId":432978,"journal":{"name":"NCSL International Workshop & Symposium Conference Proceedings 2017","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NCSL International Workshop & Symposium Conference Proceedings 2017","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51843/wsproceedings.2017.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The accuracy of a calibration or testing scenario is often measured using the Test Uncertainty Ratio (TUR) which is the ratio of the specification to be tested to the calibration process uncertainty. As a result of improvements in the state of the art in Test, Measurement, and Diagnostic Equipment (TMDE), it is often difficult to meet TUR requirements. When a TUR requirement can't be met, what then? As a result of the transition to the use of the Probability of False Acceptance (PFA) as a primary metric for calibration testing, there are many appropriate strategies for dealing with this situation. A common approach is to simply apply a guard band to the test tolerances. However, it has been found that this is not always appropriate. In fact, there is a fairly narrow set of situations in which guard bands should be employed. This paper discusses alternatives that should be considered in addition to guard bands.
低测试不确定度比处理策略
校准或测试方案的准确性通常使用测试不确定度比(TUR)来测量,该不确定度比是待测规格与校准过程不确定度的比率。由于测试、测量和诊断设备(TMDE)技术水平的提高,通常很难满足TUR要求。当turr要求无法满足时,该怎么办?由于转换到使用错误接受概率(PFA)作为校准测试的主要度量,因此有许多适当的策略来处理这种情况。一种常见的方法是简单地在测试公差上应用保护带。然而,人们发现这并不总是合适的。事实上,只有在相当有限的情况下才应该使用护手。本文讨论了除保护带外应考虑的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信