The effect of speculatively updating branch history on branch prediction accuracy, revisited

MICRO 27 Pub Date : 1994-11-30 DOI:10.1145/192724.192756
E. Hao, Po-Yung Chang, Y. Patt
{"title":"The effect of speculatively updating branch history on branch prediction accuracy, revisited","authors":"E. Hao, Po-Yung Chang, Y. Patt","doi":"10.1145/192724.192756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent research has suggested that the branch history register need not contain the outcomes of the most recent branches in order for the Two-Level Adaptive Branch Predictor to work well. From this result, it is tempting to conclude that the branch history register need not be speculatively updated. This paper revisits this work and explains when the most recent branch outcomes can be omitted without significantly affecting performance. It also explains why this result does not imply that speculative update is not important. This paper shows that because the number of unresolved branches present in the machine varies during program execution, branch predictors without speculative update perform significantly worse than branch predictors with speculative update.","PeriodicalId":150283,"journal":{"name":"MICRO 27","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"62","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MICRO 27","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/192724.192756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 62

Abstract

Recent research has suggested that the branch history register need not contain the outcomes of the most recent branches in order for the Two-Level Adaptive Branch Predictor to work well. From this result, it is tempting to conclude that the branch history register need not be speculatively updated. This paper revisits this work and explains when the most recent branch outcomes can be omitted without significantly affecting performance. It also explains why this result does not imply that speculative update is not important. This paper shows that because the number of unresolved branches present in the machine varies during program execution, branch predictors without speculative update perform significantly worse than branch predictors with speculative update.
投机更新分支历史对分支预测精度的影响,重新审视
最近的研究表明,为了使两级自适应分支预测器工作良好,分支历史寄存器不需要包含最近分支的结果。从这个结果来看,很容易得出分支历史寄存器不需要进行推测性更新的结论。本文回顾了这项工作,并解释了何时可以在不显著影响性能的情况下省略最新的分支结果。这也解释了为什么这个结果并不意味着推测性更新不重要。本文表明,由于机器中存在的未解决分支的数量在程序执行期间发生变化,因此没有推测更新的分支预测器的性能明显低于具有推测更新的分支预测器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信