[Efficiency of sequential aorta-coronary vein-bypass (author's transl)].

H G Borst, K H Leitz, W Liese, D Dragojevic, P Lichtlen
{"title":"[Efficiency of sequential aorta-coronary vein-bypass (author's transl)].","authors":"H G Borst,&nbsp;K H Leitz,&nbsp;W Liese,&nbsp;D Dragojevic,&nbsp;P Lichtlen","doi":"10.1055/s-0028-1096627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>From 1976 to 1977 308 patients were treated with multiple aorto-coronary vein-bypass. Fiftytwo patients receiving sequential bypasses were compared with 256 patients in whom conventional multiple anastomoses were performed. The rate of postoperative bypass failure did not differ significantly in the two types of anastomoses: 16 per cent in sequential as compared to 18 per cent in conventional bypass. In both cases the circumflex-system was afflicted by bypass failure more frequently (20 per cent each). The practical and theoretical advantages and disadvantages of the two procedures are discussed. Sequential aortocoronary vein-bypass is considered the method of choice for certain combinations of coronary stenoses and also if an adequate length of vein can not be obtained.</p>","PeriodicalId":22981,"journal":{"name":"Thoraxchirurgie, vaskulare Chirurgie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0028-1096627","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoraxchirurgie, vaskulare Chirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1096627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From 1976 to 1977 308 patients were treated with multiple aorto-coronary vein-bypass. Fiftytwo patients receiving sequential bypasses were compared with 256 patients in whom conventional multiple anastomoses were performed. The rate of postoperative bypass failure did not differ significantly in the two types of anastomoses: 16 per cent in sequential as compared to 18 per cent in conventional bypass. In both cases the circumflex-system was afflicted by bypass failure more frequently (20 per cent each). The practical and theoretical advantages and disadvantages of the two procedures are discussed. Sequential aortocoronary vein-bypass is considered the method of choice for certain combinations of coronary stenoses and also if an adequate length of vein can not be obtained.

序贯主动脉-冠状动脉搭桥术的有效性(作者的transl)。
从1976年到1977年,308例患者接受了多次主动脉-冠状静脉搭桥治疗。52例行序贯旁路手术的患者与256例行常规多次吻合的患者进行比较。两种吻合方式的搭桥失败率没有显著差异:顺序搭桥失败率为16%,而传统搭桥失败率为18%。在这两种情况下,回旋系统更频繁地受到旁路故障的影响(各占20%)。讨论了这两种方法在实践和理论上的优缺点。序贯冠状动脉旁路是冠状动脉狭窄组合的首选方法,如果不能获得足够长度的静脉,也可以选择序贯冠状动脉旁路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信