PENCANTUMAN SERTIFIKAT KEANDALAN (LOGO TRUSTMARK) SEBAGAI BENTUK PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN E-COMMERCE DITINJAU DARI PERATURAN YANG BERLAKU

Nathania Tesalonica, B. Wulandari
{"title":"PENCANTUMAN SERTIFIKAT KEANDALAN (LOGO TRUSTMARK) SEBAGAI BENTUK PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN E-COMMERCE DITINJAU DARI PERATURAN YANG BERLAKU","authors":"Nathania Tesalonica, B. Wulandari","doi":"10.28932/di.v13i1.3874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of information and communication technology that is increasing has made a major contribution to meeting human needs. The presence of the internet provides convenience in making buying and selling transactions, through e-commerce. The presence of Law no. 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions is one of the legal instruments in protecting e-commerce consumers. The law regulates one form of protection that can be carried out through the inclusion of a certificate of reliability (trustmark). Based on the analysis using the normative juridical research method, it was found that in the case of the inclusion of a reliability certificate (trustmark) issued by a Foreign Reliability Certification Agency, the government has not taken legal action regarding this matter, so that the inclusion of a reliability certificate (trustmark) can still be applied as long as there are no regulations issued. Arrange. In relation to legal actions that can be taken by the parties for losses in e-commerce transactions due to the absence of a trustmark logo, namely by imposing sanctions on business actors and consumers can demand rights that should be fulfilled in buying and selling transactions through existing mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":246508,"journal":{"name":"Dialogia Iuridica: Jurnal Hukum Bisnis dan Investasi","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogia Iuridica: Jurnal Hukum Bisnis dan Investasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28932/di.v13i1.3874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The development of information and communication technology that is increasing has made a major contribution to meeting human needs. The presence of the internet provides convenience in making buying and selling transactions, through e-commerce. The presence of Law no. 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions is one of the legal instruments in protecting e-commerce consumers. The law regulates one form of protection that can be carried out through the inclusion of a certificate of reliability (trustmark). Based on the analysis using the normative juridical research method, it was found that in the case of the inclusion of a reliability certificate (trustmark) issued by a Foreign Reliability Certification Agency, the government has not taken legal action regarding this matter, so that the inclusion of a reliability certificate (trustmark) can still be applied as long as there are no regulations issued. Arrange. In relation to legal actions that can be taken by the parties for losses in e-commerce transactions due to the absence of a trustmark logo, namely by imposing sanctions on business actors and consumers can demand rights that should be fulfilled in buying and selling transactions through existing mechanisms.
在适用监管下,将担保证书(TRUSTMARK标志)作为消费者电子商务保护形式进行认证
日益增长的信息和通信技术的发展为满足人类需求作出了重大贡献。互联网的存在通过电子商务为买卖交易提供了便利。法律的存在。2016年第19号关于修改2008年第11号关于信息和电子交易的法律是保护电子商务消费者的法律文书之一。法律规定了一种可以通过包含可靠性证书(trustmark)来实施的保护形式。通过运用规范的法律研究方法进行分析,发现在纳入国外可靠性认证机构颁发的可靠性证书(trustmark)的情况下,政府并没有对此事采取法律行动,因此只要没有出台法规,可靠性证书(trustmark)的纳入仍然可以适用。安排。关于各方因缺乏信任标志而可能对电子商务交易中的损失采取的法律行动,即通过对商业行为者实施制裁,消费者可以通过现有机制要求在买卖交易中应履行的权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信