A clinical study of the benefits and effectiveness of a respiratory viral panel PCR study in children presenting with respiratory tract infections

K. Thattakkat
{"title":"A clinical study of the benefits and effectiveness of a respiratory viral panel PCR study in children presenting with respiratory tract infections","authors":"K. Thattakkat","doi":"10.12968/chhe.2022.3.2.95","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Respiratory illnesses account for more than half of paediatric diseases and it is often difficult to differentiate viral and bacterial agents by clinical assessment, leading to unnecessary investigations and interventions including hospitalisation and use of antibiotics. A respiratory virus panel (RVP) multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test can identify the pathogen rapidly with specificity. The objective of this study was to explore the characteristics and outcomes of children who had RVP PCR and to identify its impact on the use of antibiotics, hospitalisation, and revisit and readmission rates. The medical records of 100 children under 18 years old in one hospital in Dubai who had an RVP PCR test in December 2019 were reviewed to investigate the type of pathogen identified as well as hospitalisation and antibiotic use rates. Out of 100 children, 85 had a positive RVP result. Rhino/enterovirus was the single most common virus (28.8%) identified. There was a hospital admission rate of 9%, as one baby in the neonatal intensive care unit had an RVP PCR test during the study period. This baby was excluded during the statistical analysis as the baby was not an outpatient at the time of testing. Seven children received antibiotics. Of the 87 patients sent home, 10 (11.5%) only received antibiotics. Overall, 14 patients revisited the hospital within 1 week. There was no antibiotic use at follow up and the readmission rate was 0%. This study illustrates that a positive RVP PCR result leads to beneficial outcomes such as low rates of hospitalisation and antibiotic use. With thoughtful clinical correlation, the RVP PCR can be a useful and cost-effective tool for clinical management.","PeriodicalId":354264,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Child Health","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Child Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/chhe.2022.3.2.95","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Respiratory illnesses account for more than half of paediatric diseases and it is often difficult to differentiate viral and bacterial agents by clinical assessment, leading to unnecessary investigations and interventions including hospitalisation and use of antibiotics. A respiratory virus panel (RVP) multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test can identify the pathogen rapidly with specificity. The objective of this study was to explore the characteristics and outcomes of children who had RVP PCR and to identify its impact on the use of antibiotics, hospitalisation, and revisit and readmission rates. The medical records of 100 children under 18 years old in one hospital in Dubai who had an RVP PCR test in December 2019 were reviewed to investigate the type of pathogen identified as well as hospitalisation and antibiotic use rates. Out of 100 children, 85 had a positive RVP result. Rhino/enterovirus was the single most common virus (28.8%) identified. There was a hospital admission rate of 9%, as one baby in the neonatal intensive care unit had an RVP PCR test during the study period. This baby was excluded during the statistical analysis as the baby was not an outpatient at the time of testing. Seven children received antibiotics. Of the 87 patients sent home, 10 (11.5%) only received antibiotics. Overall, 14 patients revisited the hospital within 1 week. There was no antibiotic use at follow up and the readmission rate was 0%. This study illustrates that a positive RVP PCR result leads to beneficial outcomes such as low rates of hospitalisation and antibiotic use. With thoughtful clinical correlation, the RVP PCR can be a useful and cost-effective tool for clinical management.
呼吸道病毒面板PCR研究在儿童呼吸道感染中的益处和有效性的临床研究
呼吸道疾病占儿科疾病的一半以上,通常难以通过临床评估区分病毒和细菌病原体,导致不必要的调查和干预措施,包括住院和使用抗生素。呼吸道病毒面板(RVP)多重聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测可快速特异性鉴定病原体。本研究的目的是探讨RVP PCR患儿的特点和结局,并确定其对抗生素使用、住院、再访率和再入院率的影响。对迪拜一家医院100名18岁以下儿童的医疗记录进行了审查,这些儿童于2019年12月进行了RVP PCR检测,以调查发现的病原体类型以及住院率和抗生素使用率。在100名儿童中,85人的RVP结果呈阳性。犀牛/肠病毒是最常见的单一病毒(28.8%)。住院率为9%,因为在研究期间,新生儿重症监护病房的一名婴儿进行了RVP PCR检测。该婴儿在统计分析中被排除在外,因为该婴儿在测试时不是门诊病人。7名儿童接受了抗生素治疗。在87名被送回家的患者中,10名(11.5%)只接受了抗生素治疗。总体而言,14例患者在1周内再次就诊。随访无抗生素使用,再入院率为0%。这项研究表明,RVP PCR阳性结果可导致有益的结果,如低住院率和抗生素使用。经过深思熟虑的临床相关性,RVP PCR可以成为临床管理的有用且具有成本效益的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信