The Economic Potential of Using Cotton Stalks to Produce Alternative Wooden Materials

H. Chbib, Irene Samy, Mona Azouz
{"title":"The Economic Potential of Using Cotton Stalks to Produce Alternative Wooden Materials","authors":"H. Chbib, Irene Samy, Mona Azouz","doi":"10.1109/NILES.2019.8909340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The wooden industry depends heavily on logging activities which have negative impacts on the environment and a shortage of supply. The industry is starting to depend on composite boards from agricultural waste materials. Composite boards have been shown in the literature. However, some wooden applications still depend on hardwoods. Besides, most of these composite boards use synthetic formaldehyde as binders. Formaldehydes have negative impacts on human health. On the other hand, Egypt has an abundance of cotton waste that can produce composite woods. In this paper, the researchers compared three different technologies to produce: particle boards, medium-density fiberboards (MDF), and Hardwood-like boards. The comparison was based on the economic feasibility and the quality variables tested in the literature. The first technology produces particle boards and the second MDF. The two technologies use formaldehyde binders in the production process, but only the first has been proven to be economically feasible. On the other hand, the third technology is based on natural binding. This paper provides an economically feasible alternative for traditional wood without using formaldehyde.","PeriodicalId":330822,"journal":{"name":"2019 Novel Intelligent and Leading Emerging Sciences Conference (NILES)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Novel Intelligent and Leading Emerging Sciences Conference (NILES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NILES.2019.8909340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The wooden industry depends heavily on logging activities which have negative impacts on the environment and a shortage of supply. The industry is starting to depend on composite boards from agricultural waste materials. Composite boards have been shown in the literature. However, some wooden applications still depend on hardwoods. Besides, most of these composite boards use synthetic formaldehyde as binders. Formaldehydes have negative impacts on human health. On the other hand, Egypt has an abundance of cotton waste that can produce composite woods. In this paper, the researchers compared three different technologies to produce: particle boards, medium-density fiberboards (MDF), and Hardwood-like boards. The comparison was based on the economic feasibility and the quality variables tested in the literature. The first technology produces particle boards and the second MDF. The two technologies use formaldehyde binders in the production process, but only the first has been proven to be economically feasible. On the other hand, the third technology is based on natural binding. This paper provides an economically feasible alternative for traditional wood without using formaldehyde.
利用棉花秸秆生产替代木质材料的经济潜力
木材工业在很大程度上依赖于伐木活动,这对环境产生了负面影响,并造成供应短缺。该行业开始依赖从农业废料中提取的复合板。复合板已在文献中得到展示。然而,一些木材应用仍然依赖于硬木。此外,这些复合板大多使用合成甲醛作为粘合剂。甲醛对人体健康有负面影响。另一方面,埃及有丰富的棉花废料,可以生产复合木材。在论文中,研究人员比较了三种不同的生产技术:刨花板、中密度纤维板(MDF)和硬木类板。比较是基于经济可行性和文献中检验的质量变量。第一种技术生产刨花板,第二种技术生产中密度纤维板。这两种技术在生产过程中都使用甲醛粘合剂,但只有第一种技术被证明是经济可行的。另一方面,第三种技术是基于自然绑定的。本文提供了一种经济可行的替代传统木材的不含甲醛的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信