Global Refugee Crisis

M. Doyle
{"title":"Global Refugee Crisis","authors":"M. Doyle","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198800613.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The chapter argues that any effort to share responsibility for refugee asylum will draw upon some cosmopolitan notion of moral and institutional responsibility, but measures far short of a genuinely cosmopolitan legal order could improve the global reception of refugees. Current responsibility is, in practice, based on ‘proximity’ to conflicts, leaving upwards of 84 per cent of the world’s refugees the responsibility of the developing world. The chapter thus suggests that what is required now is to reform existing global structures in order to create alternative assistance pathways that reflect ‘culpability’ for causing the harm that resulted in flight, and ‘capability’ to provide assistance at least proportionate to national cost.","PeriodicalId":332779,"journal":{"name":"The State and Cosmopolitan Responsibilities","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The State and Cosmopolitan Responsibilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198800613.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The chapter argues that any effort to share responsibility for refugee asylum will draw upon some cosmopolitan notion of moral and institutional responsibility, but measures far short of a genuinely cosmopolitan legal order could improve the global reception of refugees. Current responsibility is, in practice, based on ‘proximity’ to conflicts, leaving upwards of 84 per cent of the world’s refugees the responsibility of the developing world. The chapter thus suggests that what is required now is to reform existing global structures in order to create alternative assistance pathways that reflect ‘culpability’ for causing the harm that resulted in flight, and ‘capability’ to provide assistance at least proportionate to national cost.
全球难民危机
本章认为,任何分担难民庇护责任的努力,都将借鉴一些世界性的道德和制度责任概念,但远未达到真正世界性的法律秩序的措施,可能会改善全球对难民的接纳。实际上,目前的责任是基于“接近”冲突,使世界上84%以上的难民由发展中国家负责。因此,本章建议,现在需要的是改革现有的全球结构,以创造另一种援助途径,反映造成导致逃亡的伤害的“罪责”,以及至少与国家成本成比例的提供援助的“能力”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信