Comparison of pressure-velocity coupling schemes for 2D flow problems

Edouard Audi
{"title":"Comparison of pressure-velocity coupling schemes for 2D flow problems","authors":"Edouard Audi","doi":"10.1109/ACTEA.2009.5227833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Predicting accurately the behaviour of fluids, whether it is water, air, petrol or blood, is of crucial importance in numerous fields such as engineering and medicine. The most widely used way to solve fluid flow problems is to use pressure-correction methods based on algorithms such as SIMPLE (Semi Implicit Method for Pressure Linked Equations), SIMPLER (Revised), SIMPLEC (Consistent) or PISO (Pressure Implicit with Splitting of Operators). FLUENT and STAR CD are the main software capable of calculating and plotting fluid flows for specified problems, using pressure-correction methods. Nevertheless these programs, intended for commercial use, are not ‘user friendly’ and are therefore very difficult to use efficiently; furthermore once the program finds the answer it is not easy to understand how it got to it. The aim of this research is to implement the algorithms SIMPLE, SIMPLER, SIMPLEC and PISO into Matlab in order to create a ‘user-friendly’ program that a novice user can use straightforwardly and efficiently, whilst at the same time understanding what calculations the computer performs between the specification of the problem and the answers. Using this code we will then solve 2D flow problems with the different algorithms and compare their different performances (computer time, convergence and accuracy). This research should result in a program which is user-friendly and which uses a new improved algorithm (combination of the above or new altogether) that performs better than the existing ones, thereafter reducing computational times and improving accuracy.","PeriodicalId":308909,"journal":{"name":"2009 International Conference on Advances in Computational Tools for Engineering Applications","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 International Conference on Advances in Computational Tools for Engineering Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACTEA.2009.5227833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Predicting accurately the behaviour of fluids, whether it is water, air, petrol or blood, is of crucial importance in numerous fields such as engineering and medicine. The most widely used way to solve fluid flow problems is to use pressure-correction methods based on algorithms such as SIMPLE (Semi Implicit Method for Pressure Linked Equations), SIMPLER (Revised), SIMPLEC (Consistent) or PISO (Pressure Implicit with Splitting of Operators). FLUENT and STAR CD are the main software capable of calculating and plotting fluid flows for specified problems, using pressure-correction methods. Nevertheless these programs, intended for commercial use, are not ‘user friendly’ and are therefore very difficult to use efficiently; furthermore once the program finds the answer it is not easy to understand how it got to it. The aim of this research is to implement the algorithms SIMPLE, SIMPLER, SIMPLEC and PISO into Matlab in order to create a ‘user-friendly’ program that a novice user can use straightforwardly and efficiently, whilst at the same time understanding what calculations the computer performs between the specification of the problem and the answers. Using this code we will then solve 2D flow problems with the different algorithms and compare their different performances (computer time, convergence and accuracy). This research should result in a program which is user-friendly and which uses a new improved algorithm (combination of the above or new altogether) that performs better than the existing ones, thereafter reducing computational times and improving accuracy.
二维流动问题压力-速度耦合方案的比较
准确预测流体的行为,无论是水、空气、汽油还是血液,在工程和医学等许多领域都至关重要。解决流体流动问题最广泛使用的方法是使用基于SIMPLE(压力链接方程的半隐式方法)、SIMPLE(修正)、SIMPLEC(一致)或PISO(分裂算子的压力隐式)等算法的压力校正方法。FLUENT和STAR CD是能够使用压力校正方法计算和绘制特定问题流体流动的主要软件。然而,这些用于商业用途的程序并不“用户友好”,因此很难有效地使用;此外,一旦程序找到了答案,就不容易理解它是如何得到答案的。本研究的目的是将算法SIMPLE, SIMPLE, SIMPLEC和PISO实现到Matlab中,以创建一个“用户友好”的程序,新手用户可以直接有效地使用,同时了解计算机在问题和答案之间执行的计算。使用此代码,我们将用不同的算法解决二维流问题,并比较它们的不同性能(计算机时间,收敛性和精度)。这项研究应该产生一个程序,它是用户友好的,它使用了一个新的改进算法(以上的组合或新的全部),性能比现有的更好,从而减少计算时间和提高准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信