Perbandingan Ketepatan Formula Risanto dan Johnson Toshack dalam Menentukan Taksiran Berat Janin

Netti Herawati, Herinawati Herinawati, Ajeng Galuh Wuryandari, Ry Eny Mian Marisi Simanjuntak, Miftahul Jannah
{"title":"Perbandingan Ketepatan Formula Risanto dan Johnson Toshack dalam Menentukan Taksiran Berat Janin","authors":"Netti Herawati, Herinawati Herinawati, Ajeng Galuh Wuryandari, Ry Eny Mian Marisi Simanjuntak, Miftahul Jannah","doi":"10.36565/jab.v11i2.592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Measurement of uterine fundal height (TFU) to determine the estimated fetal weight (TBJ) is an important component of antenatal care in labor management. Babies born with low body weight or born with very large body weight are associated with increased complications during labor and the puerperium. This study aims to compare the accuracy of the Risanto and Johnson Toshack formulas in determining the estimated fetal weight. The design of this study was cross-sectional, with the sample being parturient mothers in the PMB working area of the Tangkit Health Center in 2022 who met the inclusion criteria, which amounted to 87 people. The sampling technique is accidental sampling. The results showed that the Risanto and Johnson Toshack formulas were compatible in estimating the baby's birth weight (p-value 0.497 and 0.377). The average difference between the TBJ of Risanto's theory and the baby's weight is 34.42 grams, while the average difference between the TBJ of Johnson Toshack's formula is 171.15 grams. The test results comparing the accuracy of the Risanto formula and the Johnson Toshack formula, the average value of TBJ Johnson Toshack is greater than the average value of TBJ Risanto, and TBJ Risanto is closer to the baby's birth weight. The conclusion of this study shows that Risanto's TBJ measurement is more accurate than Johnson's TBJ Toshack. Measurement TBJ uses the Risanto formula that health workers can apply to detect fetal well-being, including estimated fetal weight during pregnancy and delivery.","PeriodicalId":200541,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Akademika Baiturrahim Jambi","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Akademika Baiturrahim Jambi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36565/jab.v11i2.592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Measurement of uterine fundal height (TFU) to determine the estimated fetal weight (TBJ) is an important component of antenatal care in labor management. Babies born with low body weight or born with very large body weight are associated with increased complications during labor and the puerperium. This study aims to compare the accuracy of the Risanto and Johnson Toshack formulas in determining the estimated fetal weight. The design of this study was cross-sectional, with the sample being parturient mothers in the PMB working area of the Tangkit Health Center in 2022 who met the inclusion criteria, which amounted to 87 people. The sampling technique is accidental sampling. The results showed that the Risanto and Johnson Toshack formulas were compatible in estimating the baby's birth weight (p-value 0.497 and 0.377). The average difference between the TBJ of Risanto's theory and the baby's weight is 34.42 grams, while the average difference between the TBJ of Johnson Toshack's formula is 171.15 grams. The test results comparing the accuracy of the Risanto formula and the Johnson Toshack formula, the average value of TBJ Johnson Toshack is greater than the average value of TBJ Risanto, and TBJ Risanto is closer to the baby's birth weight. The conclusion of this study shows that Risanto's TBJ measurement is more accurate than Johnson's TBJ Toshack. Measurement TBJ uses the Risanto formula that health workers can apply to detect fetal well-being, including estimated fetal weight during pregnancy and delivery.
测量子宫底高(TFU)以确定胎儿体重(TBJ)是分娩管理中产前护理的重要组成部分。出生时体重过轻或体重过大的婴儿在分娩和产褥期的并发症增加。本研究旨在比较Risanto和Johnson Toshack公式在确定估计胎儿体重方面的准确性。本研究采用横断面设计,样本为2022年在Tangkit健康中心PMB工作区域符合纳入标准的产妇,共87人。抽样技术是随机抽样。结果表明,Risanto配方奶粉和Johnson Toshack配方奶粉对婴儿出生体重的估计是一致的(p值分别为0.497和0.377)。Risanto理论的TBJ与婴儿体重的平均差异为34.42克,而Johnson Toshack公式的TBJ与婴儿体重的平均差异为171.15克。检测结果对比Risanto配方和Johnson Toshack配方的准确性,TBJ Johnson Toshack的平均值大于TBJ Risanto的平均值,TBJ Risanto更接近婴儿出生体重。本研究的结论表明,Risanto的TBJ测量比Johnson的TBJ Toshack测量更准确。TBJ测量使用Risanto公式,卫生工作者可应用该公式检测胎儿健康,包括妊娠和分娩期间胎儿体重的估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信