Media Alignment: Information Reproduction Patterns of Middle East Conflict in Indonesian Media

Y. Faisol, S. Hadi, Reflinaldi Reflinaldi, W. Rahmat, R. Fakhrurrazy
{"title":"Media Alignment: Information Reproduction Patterns of Middle East Conflict in Indonesian Media","authors":"Y. Faisol, S. Hadi, Reflinaldi Reflinaldi, W. Rahmat, R. Fakhrurrazy","doi":"10.4108/EAI.23-3-2019.2284985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to uncover the information reproduction pattern of Middle East conflict in Indonesian online mass media. The study model is descriptive qualitative model. The data was taken from the reports on Syrian conflict in Indonesian online mass media i.e. Republika, Kompas, and Tempo. In accordance with the orientation of the study, the data must be conducted on the news from January to October 2018. Data were analyzed by using Miles and Huberman stages of qualitative analysis models. The findings of the study indicate that each media from the data source taken has different ways and perspective in reproducing information and news related to the Middle East conflict. Republika tends to take the point of view againts Syrian government, which bring the United States and its allies to be the central of the news. In the other hand, Kompas is departed from the point of view of the Syrian government and allies by dwarfing the United States and its allies in the news. As the third axis, Tempo takes a chronological perspective and highlights many humanitarian issues in the news.","PeriodicalId":222337,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the First International Conference on Advances in Education, Humanities, and Language, ICEL 2019, Malang, Indonesia, 23-24 March 2019","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the First International Conference on Advances in Education, Humanities, and Language, ICEL 2019, Malang, Indonesia, 23-24 March 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/EAI.23-3-2019.2284985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study aims to uncover the information reproduction pattern of Middle East conflict in Indonesian online mass media. The study model is descriptive qualitative model. The data was taken from the reports on Syrian conflict in Indonesian online mass media i.e. Republika, Kompas, and Tempo. In accordance with the orientation of the study, the data must be conducted on the news from January to October 2018. Data were analyzed by using Miles and Huberman stages of qualitative analysis models. The findings of the study indicate that each media from the data source taken has different ways and perspective in reproducing information and news related to the Middle East conflict. Republika tends to take the point of view againts Syrian government, which bring the United States and its allies to be the central of the news. In the other hand, Kompas is departed from the point of view of the Syrian government and allies by dwarfing the United States and its allies in the news. As the third axis, Tempo takes a chronological perspective and highlights many humanitarian issues in the news.
媒介对齐:印尼媒体中中东冲突的信息复制模式
本研究旨在揭示印尼网路大众媒体对中东冲突的资讯再生产模式。研究模型为描述性定性模型。数据取自印尼大众网络媒体Republika、Kompas和Tempo对叙利亚冲突的报道。根据研究方向,数据必须在2018年1月至10月的新闻上进行。数据分析采用Miles和Huberman阶段的定性分析模型。研究结果表明,从所采用的数据源来看,每种媒体在再现与中东冲突有关的信息和新闻方面都有不同的方式和视角。共和国倾向于采取反对叙利亚政府的观点,这使得美国及其盟友成为新闻的中心。另一方面,Kompas脱离了叙利亚政府及其盟友的观点,在新闻中使美国及其盟友相形见绌。作为第三个轴,Tempo采用时间顺序的视角,突出了新闻中的许多人道主义问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信