A comparison of explicit and implicit attitudes towards crop protection methods in Costa Rica and Germany

H. Schaak, Ulf Römer, O. Musshoff, Mercedes Montero Vega
{"title":"A comparison of explicit and implicit attitudes towards crop protection methods in Costa Rica and Germany","authors":"H. Schaak, Ulf Römer, O. Musshoff, Mercedes Montero Vega","doi":"10.1080/27685241.2021.1999180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Crop protection technologies and their usage are critically discussed issues, both in the public discourse and within the agricultural sector. However, attitudes towards different methods of crop protection have been primarily investigated through surveys thus far. Thus, explicit attitudes can be biased. Furthermore, they can differ between countries. The study aims to contribute to the understanding of explicit and implicit attitudes of two crop protection methods (chemical and genetically modified crop protection) in Costa Rica and Germany. The implicit attitude was measured by a single-category implicit association test. The test was conducted with a total of 441 agricultural students: 208 from Costa Rica and 233 from Germany. The results argue for regional heterogeneity in attitudes towards crop protection methods as genetically modified crop protection is perceived more positive in Costa Rica than in Germany. This might impact the regional acceptance of multilateral policies. The results also highlight the importance of the method selection for the elicitation of attitudes.","PeriodicalId":211218,"journal":{"name":"NJAS: Impact in Agricultural and Life Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NJAS: Impact in Agricultural and Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/27685241.2021.1999180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Crop protection technologies and their usage are critically discussed issues, both in the public discourse and within the agricultural sector. However, attitudes towards different methods of crop protection have been primarily investigated through surveys thus far. Thus, explicit attitudes can be biased. Furthermore, they can differ between countries. The study aims to contribute to the understanding of explicit and implicit attitudes of two crop protection methods (chemical and genetically modified crop protection) in Costa Rica and Germany. The implicit attitude was measured by a single-category implicit association test. The test was conducted with a total of 441 agricultural students: 208 from Costa Rica and 233 from Germany. The results argue for regional heterogeneity in attitudes towards crop protection methods as genetically modified crop protection is perceived more positive in Costa Rica than in Germany. This might impact the regional acceptance of multilateral policies. The results also highlight the importance of the method selection for the elicitation of attitudes.
哥斯达黎加和德国对作物保护方法的显性和隐性态度的比较
作物保护技术及其使用是公共话语和农业部门讨论的关键问题。然而,迄今为止,对不同作物保护方法的态度主要是通过调查来调查的。因此,明确的态度是有偏见的。此外,它们可能因国家而异。该研究旨在帮助理解哥斯达黎加和德国对两种作物保护方法(化学和转基因作物保护)的显性和隐性态度。内隐态度采用单类别内隐联想测验。该测试共对441名农业学生进行,其中208名来自哥斯达黎加,233名来自德国。结果表明,对作物保护方法的态度存在地区差异,因为哥斯达黎加比德国认为转基因作物保护更积极。这可能影响区域对多边政策的接受。结果还强调了方法选择对态度的启发的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信