The Manners of Liberalism: A Question of Limits

W. Allen
{"title":"The Manners of Liberalism: A Question of Limits","authors":"W. Allen","doi":"10.1080/00193089.1982.10533778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"not as a temporizer but as a corrupter. Socrates won fame by hurling the charge of temporizing with evil against intellectuals of his day. Nor is the charge always invoked by social radicals and rebels. Julian Benda's La Trahison des Clercs of only a few years ago convicts the new intellectuals not only of temporizing with evil but of prostituting themselves to it.2 The substance of this charge is that liberal education leads men to substitute intellectual tolerance or am biguity for righteous indignation. (This will be familiar to anyone who, from a few years ago, recalls the main","PeriodicalId":126898,"journal":{"name":"Improving College and University Teaching","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Improving College and University Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00193089.1982.10533778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

not as a temporizer but as a corrupter. Socrates won fame by hurling the charge of temporizing with evil against intellectuals of his day. Nor is the charge always invoked by social radicals and rebels. Julian Benda's La Trahison des Clercs of only a few years ago convicts the new intellectuals not only of temporizing with evil but of prostituting themselves to it.2 The substance of this charge is that liberal education leads men to substitute intellectual tolerance or am biguity for righteous indignation. (This will be familiar to anyone who, from a few years ago, recalls the main
自由主义的礼仪:一个限制的问题
不是作为一个拖延者,而是作为一个破坏者。苏格拉底因指责他那个时代的知识分子迎合邪恶而名声大噪。社会激进分子和反叛者也并非总是援引这一指控。朱利安·本达几年前的《神职人员的背叛》谴责新知识分子不仅与邪恶为伍,而且使自己沦为邪恶的妓女这种指责的实质是,博雅教育导致人们用理智上的宽容或狭隘来代替正义的义愤。(这对任何回忆起几年前主要的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信